找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Linguistic Analysis and Phenomenology; Wolfe Mays (Reader in Philosophy, Editor of ‘The J Book 1972 The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1972

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 外表
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 15:43:57 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 20:20:56 | 只看該作者
Reply to Miss Berry’s Paper, her point is that Biran’s position somehow stands for a wider philosophical persuasion, viz., that of phenomenology. If this understanding is correct it may be advisable first to look briefly into her criticism of Biran and next into the relevance of this criticism to phenomenology. Finally, we sh
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 00:33:38 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 05:55:48 | 只看該作者
The Two Personsbeen attacked from various points of view. Many of these attacks, however, so far from rejecting what is usually known as Cartesian dualism, have merely launched the same doctrine under a new rig. They have distinguished between mental and physical objects, processes and cognitions (between ideas an
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 08:47:29 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:09:43 | 只看該作者
The Critic and the Lover of Artnorm actually exists. It seems that he recognised that if there is no common aesthetic sense a universal community of taste could not be achieved simply by everyone’s contemplating Nature and Art disinterestedly, for he suggests that if this common sense does not exist the demand of the judgement of
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:16:57 | 只看該作者
Commentary on Mr Elliott’s Paperin deep agreement with its author; and how could it be otherwise, when Mr Elliott is so kind as to invoke me, and when he has perfectly understood what I have tried to say elsewhere ? If I enter this discussion with him, it is in no sense to present a contrary thesis, but to take up and extend his r
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 22:55:35 | 只看該作者
Chairman’s Opening Remarksnts are in principle correct or incorrect. Whether they admit it or not, they are passing verdicts for which reasoned justification could be provided. This view, he maintains, is not merely unduly restrictive, it is essentially mistaken. It presupposes either some kind of natural norm (perhaps a com
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:15:36 | 只看該作者
A Reply to ‘A Person’s Future and the Mind—Body Problem’ritish philosophy (e.g. the analysis of the logical priority of the concept of ‘person’) with those of Continental philosophy (e.g. the more phenomenological analysis of the future-dimension of human existence).
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 07:05:07 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 20:10
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
永春县| 台东市| 陵川县| 三门峡市| 永康市| 恩平市| 乐都县| 北流市| 台江县| 荥经县| 凌云县| 应城市| 葫芦岛市| 抚州市| 宁波市| 江津市| 乌拉特中旗| 彰武县| 永寿县| 沙湾县| 镇康县| 陵川县| 英德市| 嘉禾县| 姚安县| 新龙县| 神农架林区| 同心县| 宣武区| 黔东| 陇川县| 华容县| 西平县| 敦化市| 印江| 始兴县| 崇义县| 额敏县| 台山市| 邳州市| 临泽县|