找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Linguistic Analysis and Phenomenology; Wolfe Mays (Reader in Philosophy, Editor of ‘The J Book 1972 The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1972

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 外表
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 15:43:57 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 20:20:56 | 只看該作者
Reply to Miss Berry’s Paper, her point is that Biran’s position somehow stands for a wider philosophical persuasion, viz., that of phenomenology. If this understanding is correct it may be advisable first to look briefly into her criticism of Biran and next into the relevance of this criticism to phenomenology. Finally, we sh
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 00:33:38 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 05:55:48 | 只看該作者
The Two Personsbeen attacked from various points of view. Many of these attacks, however, so far from rejecting what is usually known as Cartesian dualism, have merely launched the same doctrine under a new rig. They have distinguished between mental and physical objects, processes and cognitions (between ideas an
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 08:47:29 | 只看該作者
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 13:09:43 | 只看該作者
The Critic and the Lover of Artnorm actually exists. It seems that he recognised that if there is no common aesthetic sense a universal community of taste could not be achieved simply by everyone’s contemplating Nature and Art disinterestedly, for he suggests that if this common sense does not exist the demand of the judgement of
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:16:57 | 只看該作者
Commentary on Mr Elliott’s Paperin deep agreement with its author; and how could it be otherwise, when Mr Elliott is so kind as to invoke me, and when he has perfectly understood what I have tried to say elsewhere ? If I enter this discussion with him, it is in no sense to present a contrary thesis, but to take up and extend his r
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 22:55:35 | 只看該作者
Chairman’s Opening Remarksnts are in principle correct or incorrect. Whether they admit it or not, they are passing verdicts for which reasoned justification could be provided. This view, he maintains, is not merely unduly restrictive, it is essentially mistaken. It presupposes either some kind of natural norm (perhaps a com
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:15:36 | 只看該作者
A Reply to ‘A Person’s Future and the Mind—Body Problem’ritish philosophy (e.g. the analysis of the logical priority of the concept of ‘person’) with those of Continental philosophy (e.g. the more phenomenological analysis of the future-dimension of human existence).
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 07:05:07 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 21:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
明星| 大同市| 衡阳县| 巨野县| 汝阳县| 林州市| 资兴市| 宁乡县| 宽城| 台江县| 博客| 黄平县| 乌拉特中旗| 桦川县| 晋宁县| 阿巴嘎旗| 洛扎县| 阿克苏市| 顺平县| 绩溪县| 南充市| 克什克腾旗| 龙海市| 尼勒克县| 都江堰市| 洛阳市| 原阳县| 获嘉县| 玉田县| 库伦旗| 山阴县| 隆化县| 保靖县| 宝山区| 灵台县| 临清市| 建宁县| 湾仔区| 阿城市| 北流市| 交口县|