找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:; An Ultimate Presuppo Jaakko Hintikka Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 Got

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 29526|回復(fù): 39
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:56:27 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:
副標(biāo)題An Ultimate Presuppo
編輯Jaakko Hintikka
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/587/586658/586658.mp4
叢書名稱Jaakko Hintikka Selected Papers
圖書封面Titlebook: Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:; An Ultimate Presuppo Jaakko Hintikka Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 Got
描述R. G. Collingwood saw one of the main tasks of philosophers and of historians of human thought in uncovering what he called the ultimate presuppositions of different thinkers, of different philosophical movements and of entire eras of intellectual history. He also noted that such ultimate presuppositions usually remain tacit at first, and are discovered only by subsequent reflection. Collingwood would have been delighted by the contrast that constitutes the overall theme of the essays collected in this volume. Not only has this dichotomy ofviews been one ofthe mostcrucial watersheds in the entire twentieth-century philosophical thought. Not only has it remained largely implicit in the writings of the philosophers for whom it mattered most. It is a truly Collingwoodian presupposition also in that it is not apremise assumed by different thinkers in their argumentation. It is the presupposition of a question, an assumption to the effect that a certain general question can be raised and answered. Its role is not belied by the fact that several philosophers who answered it one way or the other seem to be largely unaware that the other answer also makes sense - if it does. This Collingwo
出版日期Book 1997
關(guān)鍵詞Gottlob Frege; Ludwig Wittgenstein; Martin Heidegger; Rudolf Carnap; Willard Van Orman Quine; differentia
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8601-6
isbn_softcover978-90-481-4754-0
isbn_ebook978-94-015-8601-6
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:被引頻次




書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:年度引用




書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:讀者反饋




書目名稱Lingua Universalis vs. Calculus Ratiocinator:讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:02:16 | 只看該作者
Is Truth Ineffable?,robably played a more important role in the philosophy of language and philosophical analysis in general in the last hundred-odd years than any other single issue. It is a problem which would have delighted Hegel. For it has remained almost completely implicit in the actual philosophical literature.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:42:12 | 只看該作者
On the Development of the Model-Theoretic Viewpoint in Logical Theory,is a largely tacit contrast between ways of looking at the relation of language and its logic to reality. I have called them the idea of . and the idea of ... I shall also refer the two traditions representing these two respective ideas as . and as ..
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:58:22 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:00:39 | 只看該作者
,Carnap’s Work in the Foundations of Logic and Mathematics in a Historical Perspective,ls of Carnap’s work, but will try to both put it in a perspective which also includes recent and current work on the same topics and to evaluate tentatively some of Carnap’s ideas in this perspective. My enterprise therefore has a systematic component, but it is not irrelevant to the purely historic
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:32:22 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:07:53 | 只看該作者
ed explanation of uncertainty analysis using the Monte Carlo.This book provides an overview of the application of statistical methods to problems in metrology, with emphasis on modelling measurement processes and quantifying their associated uncertainties. It covers everything from fundamentals to m
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:14:01 | 只看該作者
Jaakko Hintikkaexplains their various applications at different points thro.This book provides a comprehensive overview of stellar structure, evolution and basic stellar properties. It includes integrated problems within the chapters, with worked solutions.?.In the first part of this book, the author presents the
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:06:10 | 只看該作者
Jaakko Hintikkaexplains their various applications at different points thro.This book provides a comprehensive overview of stellar structure, evolution and basic stellar properties. It includes integrated problems within the chapters, with worked solutions.?.In the first part of this book, the author presents the
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:49:21 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 12:22
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
定结县| 正宁县| 兴隆县| 阿鲁科尔沁旗| 共和县| 江门市| 长宁区| 红桥区| 青浦区| 原阳县| 白玉县| 开原市| 方城县| 罗山县| 鄢陵县| 龙井市| 晋江市| 杨浦区| 玉田县| 博客| 萨嘎县| 筠连县| 昭觉县| 安康市| 白玉县| 西丰县| 香格里拉县| 乡城县| 静乐县| 黑水县| 将乐县| 永仁县| 丹阳市| 崇阳县| 平安县| 伊金霍洛旗| 义马市| 永福县| 堆龙德庆县| 北川| 海伦市|