Titlebook: Liability Rules in Patent Law; A Legal and Economic Daniel Krauspenhaar Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

Clientele

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Liability Rules in Patent Law讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

ASSET

Book 2015conventional wisdom is that patents should therefore be strictly exclusive rights. Moreover, in practice patent owners are almost never forced to give up their right to exclude others and receive only a certain amount of remuneration with, for instance, compulsory licensing. Other economically inter

彎曲的人

Private Liability Rule Regimes,ally in the following discussion, is whether private liability rules sufficiently reduce the overuse of property rules. An additional question will be whether it is possible to support even more efficient use of those mechanisms than is currently the case.

cumulative

Introductory Remarks,e, at least with reference to the situation in the developed countries. Exactly how an optimal system should look, however, is the subject of continuous debate. For some time, there has been a discussion underway about the phenomena of the current patent law system. New terms such as ., ., . or . ar

cuticle

Overuse of Exclusivity in Patent Law,ourage innovation and, in general, to reach economic efficiency. On the one hand, the question is, therefore, whether the current German patent law system (including German and European antitrust laws), as it is currently applied, and the future system under the regulation on the European Patent wit

使入迷

Private Liability Rule Regimes,lso in the regulation on the European Patent with Unitary Effect; relying so intensively on property rules is also not mandatory from other perspectives such as distributional preferences and higher-ranking law. Another question, which has not been answered until now and should be addressed specific

Paraplegia

Nonflammable

輕率的你

Daniel Krauspenhaarny Norwegian psychologists across a wide scope of fields integrate and adopt CP principles in their work. Yet, the critical and political nature of CP has been absent. This situation is explained on the basis of sociocultural and political conditions. The ideals of social justice and security, empow

艦旗