Titlebook: Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences; Nils Petter Gleditsch Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020 The Editor(s)

papertrans

書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences被引頻次




書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences年度引用




書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences讀者反饋




書目名稱Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Sciences讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

關(guān)心

Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020wering presence in both fields. This edited volume reviews his work and assesses its influence in the social sciences, notably his work on arms races and their consequences, mathematical models, the size distribution of wars, and geographical features of conflict. It contains brief bibliographies of

Nonflammable

減去

noxious

Lewis Fry Richardson: A Personal Narrative,me provided insights into data collection and measurement as well as a deeper understanding of the mechanics of mathematical modeling. Thus, the two volumes together gave her the basis for finally answering the questions from her graduate school days.

Arbitrary

協(xié)迫

What Richardson Got Right (and Wrong) About Arms Races and War,races and war derived from the model as well as Richardson’s own empirical analyses about the connection between the two phenomena. Although in light of subsequent research, a number of Richardson’s arguments seem misguided or inaccurate, other insights were validated by later studies or remain understudied but worthy of future research.

拾落穗

不利

Richardson and the Study of Dynamic Conflict Processes,ons still inform research today, we then demonstrate how current research leverages dynamics to yield important insights concerning the origins and evolution of conflict such as when to expect norms of reciprocity to be present and to enable peace or exacerbate violence.

Alveolar-Bone