Titlebook: Legality Matters; Crimes Against Human Gillian MacNeil Book 2021 T.M.C. Asser Press and the author 2021 Crimes against humanity.Other inhum

Flexible

書目名稱Legality Matters影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Legality Matters影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legality Matters網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Legality Matters網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legality Matters被引頻次




書目名稱Legality Matters被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legality Matters年度引用




書目名稱Legality Matters年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legality Matters讀者反饋




書目名稱Legality Matters讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

最高點

Introduction,ls: they are responsible for creating new law and determining whether its application in a specific case will enhance or undermine the legitimacy of their legal system. In this work, I use the crimes against humanity prohibition on other inhumane acts to explore this issue. This chapter provides an overview of the argument contained in this book.

金桌活畫面

Book 2021ts. This clause is consistently used in spite of the long list of more specific offences forbidden as crimes against humanity.?..The volume proposes that the current approach is based on a misunderstanding of the nature of the clause. Properly understood, the clause is an invitation to courts to cre

慌張

Introduction,ational law, in an absolute prohibition on their use. Using the crimes against humanity prohibition on other inhumane acts, I suggest that we need to rethink our understanding of retroactive criminal law and its absolute prohibition. Retroactive law exists on a spectrum with vague laws; we need to c

recede

Deference

chandel

EVICT

Other Inhumane Acts: Development and Critique,ism through which crimes against humanity are able to evolve is the prohibition on other inhumane acts. This provision permits authorities to charge an accused for acts which are not specifically prohibited. In this chapter, I analyse the way in which the . . tribunals and ICC have interpreted the p

搖曳的微光

A New Way Forward: Advocating a Fullerian Approach to Other Inhumane Acts,pproach to the prohibition was required: one based on the understanding that the prohibition is a direction to courts to act as law-makers and an invitation to courts to create and apply retroactive criminal laws. In this chapter, I elaborate on that new approach. The starting point is to identify h

Acquired