找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law; Fábio P. Shecaira Book 20131st edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus

[復制鏈接]
查看: 34381|回復: 40
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:56:13 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law
編輯Fábio P. Shecaira
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/584/583768/583768.mp4
概述Deals with conceptual, empirical and normative questions about the use of legal scholarship by judges.Adopts a Hartian philosophical perspective and, in so doing, attempts to illustrate the usefulness
叢書名稱SpringerBriefs in Law
圖書封面Titlebook: Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law;  Fábio P. Shecaira Book 20131st edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclus
描述.This book is about the use of legal scholarship by judges. It discusses the possibility that legal scholarship may function as a genuine source of law in modern municipal legal systems.?The book advances a number of claims, some conceptual, some empirical, some normative. The major conceptual claims are found in Chapters 2 and 3, where a general account of the notion of a source of law is provided. Roughly, sources of law are documents or practices (e.g. statutes, judicial decisions, official customs) from which norms can be derived that function as sources of content-independent reasons for judges to decide legal cases one way or another. The relevant notion of content-independence is derived (with qualifications) from H.L.A. Hart’s jurisprudence. Indeed, the book’s analysis of the concept of a source of law relies at various points on Hartian insights about law and legal reasoning.?Chapter 4 argues that legal scholarship – or, more precisely, a particular type of legal scholarship that might be described as standard or doctrinal – can be, and indeed is, used as a source of law in modern legal systems. The conclusion that legal scholarship is used as a source of law (and thus as
出版日期Book 20131st edition
關(guān)鍵詞Authorativeness of sources of law; Challenging the Association; Content Independent Reason; Decline of
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00428-0
isbn_softcover978-3-319-00427-3
isbn_ebook978-3-319-00428-0Series ISSN 2192-855X Series E-ISSN 2192-8568
issn_series 2192-855X
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law被引頻次




書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law年度引用




書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law讀者反饋




書目名稱Legal Scholarship as a Source of Law讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:20:53 | 只看該作者
2192-855X tive and, in so doing, attempts to illustrate the usefulness.This book is about the use of legal scholarship by judges. It discusses the possibility that legal scholarship may function as a genuine source of law in modern municipal legal systems.?The book advances a number of claims, some conceptual
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:45:01 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:53:41 | 只看該作者
What is a Source of Law?,es with a caveat regarding some of the perils involved in taking judicial discourse at face value. To treat something as a source of law is to systematically approach it with a certain normative attitude. One expects to see that attitude manifested in public judicial discourse; but judicial discourse can also mislead if read superficially.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:12:09 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:51:19 | 只看該作者
Formalism and the Use of Legal Scholarship,dge’s last resort. Scholarship may be used to mitigate the impression that a judge is exercising discretion or relying on personal judgment. It follows that formalist judges have little reason to avoid scholarship; indeed they can use it (and indeed have used it) in their favor.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:36:13 | 只看該作者
Normative Questions,use it. Examples are given of judicial decisions in which judges cite to scholarship in a way that suggests that it is serving to mitigate discretion when in fact it is not. The point is that this type of judicial decision exhibits an unjustified lack of sincerity.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:19:03 | 只看該作者
ompanies to reduce enterprise output rate or failure. The purpose of this research is to help explain how the government through professional associations may increase the know how of entrepreneurs or managers of new enterprises. Of the cases studied we have learned that starting a business is a dif
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:03:39 | 只看該作者
Fábio Shecairaarrollo de la Ingeniería de Organización/?Industrial Engineers Association (ADINGOR). The aim of CIO is to establish a forum for the open and free exchange of ideas, opinions and academic experiences about research, technology transfer or successful business experiences in the field of Industrial En
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:28:06 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 05:27
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
阿合奇县| 焉耆| 阳朔县| 阿巴嘎旗| 阿克| 修文县| 双鸭山市| 务川| 明水县| 武冈市| 太白县| 甘泉县| 阜新市| 永嘉县| 牟定县| 伽师县| 谢通门县| 石屏县| 平武县| 台州市| 建宁县| 通许县| 宝山区| 富川| 东乡| 宜都市| 漳浦县| 桃园市| 大渡口区| 枣阳市| 顺义区| 正安县| 金山区| 夹江县| 荃湾区| 北票市| 长汀县| 黄冈市| 茶陵县| 和平县| 高尔夫|