Titlebook: Legal Knowledge and Analogy; Fragments of Legal E Patrick Nerhot Book 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1991 Epistemology.Herm

Eisenhower

書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy被引頻次




書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy年度引用




書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy讀者反饋




書目名稱Legal Knowledge and Analogy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

骯臟

1572-4395 reject this sort of epistemology of law, and where the hypothesis of the coherence of the legal universe is put forward, this is in order to define it in very noticeably different terms from those traditionally used in legal scholarly accounts. If this referent, the law presented as a full discours

Obituary

Analogy in Legal Science: Some Comparative Observations,cy of our problem, and on the other to indicate some non-traditional perspectives which we may usefully add in our search for understanding of the rational and reasoning processes of legal systems in the West.

欲望

流浪者

The Analogy Between Logic and Dialogic of Law,the . between the normal case and the special case, and this method allows for a flexibility of the legal system which exceeds the limits of extensive interpretation and, at the same time, limits the constraint of explicit adaptation and transformation of law.

搬運(yùn)工

一再困擾

侵略

debble

Giuseppe Zaccariablems. Several techniques have been proposed to address the efficiency issue. Such proposals include query transformations, query packs, lazy evaluation and parallel execution of ILP systems, to mention just a few. We propose a novel technique that avoids the procedure of . each example to evaluate

BOLUS

Cees W. Marisr these models have been developed and they all considered modifications in the entire structure. In a previous work we argued that when the theory is approximately correct the use of techniques from theory revision to just modify the structure in places that failed in classification can be a more a