Titlebook: Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives; Christian Dahlman,Eveline Feteris Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media D

affront

書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives被引頻次




書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives年度引用




書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives讀者反饋




書目名稱Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

發(fā)酵

The Rule of Law and the Ideal of a Critical Discussion,des a case. As a result the critical norms for evaluating argumentation are not applicable to a legal decision. In this contribution I will try to refute these two objections by showing how the ideals of a critical discussion relate to the ideals of the . and how these ideals function as starting po

光明正大

conformity

Construction or Reconstruction? On the Function of Argumentation in the Law,best . legal argument. This is the most attractive view, not in the least because its alternatives cannot well be defended. The most important objection against this view, that the best actual argument may lead to a wrong conclusion, is rejected because it presupposes that the legal consequences wer

alcohol-abuse

Constitutive Rules and Coherence in Legal Argumentation: The Case of Extensive and Restrictive InteHart, 1994, Chap. 7). Herbert Hart suggested that, in those cases, judges act as surrogate legislatures by filling legal gaps. Indeed, this view is confirmed in this paper and made analytically clear: legal concepts can be holistically and inferentially characterized by arbitrarily large and connect

mediocrity

文藝

Carlos Bernal the quasi-inexistence of systematic and discursive – rather than activist – studies on the subject-matter, the analysis questions the appropriateness of this framework in efforts aimed at empo978-90-6704-976-4978-90-6704-609-1

構(gòu)想

delegate

Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives

Mutter

1572-4395 entation organized at the 25th IVR World Congress for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy held 15-20 August 2011 in Frankfurt, Germany.? .978-94-017-8235-7978-94-007-4670-1Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315