找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Leaders in Philosophy of Education; Intellectual Self-Po Leonard J. Waks Book 2014 SensePublishers-Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2014 contempo

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 44896|回復(fù): 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:04:08 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education
副標(biāo)題Intellectual Self-Po
編輯Leonard J. Waks
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/583/582232/582232.mp4
概述Written by experts, Gives a modern approach, Comprehensive in Scope
叢書名稱Leaders in Educational Studies
圖書封面Titlebook: Leaders in Philosophy of Education; Intellectual Self-Po Leonard J. Waks Book 2014 SensePublishers-Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2014 contempo
描述In the late 1950s plans were initiated to bring a higher level of professionalism to the training of educational professionals.New projects included introducing contemporary scholarship from the humanities and social sciences into colleges of education to revitalize the education knowledge base. In North America and the United Kingdom, analytical philosophers were recruited to inaugurate a ‘new philosophy of education.’ Analytical philosophy of education soon spread throughout the English speaking world. By the 1980s this analytical impulse had largely subsided. Philosophers trained in analytical philosophy and their students turned to more ambitious normative pursuits related to problems of social justice and democracy.Meanwhile, feminist philosophers opened up new issues regarding the education of women and the nature of teaching and knowing, and a new wave of pragmatist philosophers turned to issues of educational policy. By the 1990s Anglo-American philosophers of education welcomed a dialogue with counterparts in Western Europe, and the field responded to established trends in European philosophy ranging from critical theory and phenomenology to post-structuralism. New leaders
出版日期Book 2014
關(guān)鍵詞contemporary; existentialism; pedagogy; philosophy of education
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-758-2
isbn_ebook978-94-6209-758-2
copyrightSensePublishers-Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2014
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education被引頻次




書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education年度引用




書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education讀者反饋




書目名稱Leaders in Philosophy of Education讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:43:32 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:17:42 | 只看該作者
be beneficial for security person who have preparation to deal with. However, lots of studies use global features aggregation or topK mean, and it exists feature dilution for anomaly. An attention model is proposed to generate the segment scores, i.e. we propose a salient selection way based on att
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:04:27 | 只看該作者
Leonard J. Waksof items may be influenced by many factors, such as time (the latest ratings are more able to reflect the user’s current preferences), user familiarity (the more familiar a user to an item, the more reliable of rating he gives). So ratings should have different recommended weights in different circu
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:16:10 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:14:26 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:12:11 | 只看該作者
Nicholas C. Burbules users’ ratings of items of interest and make recommendations. Therefore, various techniques have been proposed to develop similarity measures. Research on recommendation algorithms that integrate user trust information has made considerable progress. However, only the definition of trust relationsh
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:12:14 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:11:25 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:21:10 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 23:32
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
普陀区| 法库县| 锡林郭勒盟| 玉田县| 泸西县| 沅江市| 麦盖提县| 东兰县| 教育| 榕江县| 新营市| 招远市| 肥城市| 余庆县| 远安县| 泾川县| 永福县| 义乌市| 金沙县| 溧阳市| 萨嘎县| 晋中市| 日土县| 子长县| 凭祥市| 丰都县| 东莞市| 庆城县| 北安市| 阿尔山市| 云南省| 鱼台县| 南宫市| 石河子市| 屏东县| 惠安县| 陆河县| 思茅市| 吴桥县| 克山县| 新安县|