找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning; Essays on W. J. Walu Thomas Bustamante,Saulo de Matos,André L. S. Coelh Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if a

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 19315|回復(fù): 59
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:22:37 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning
副標(biāo)題Essays on W. J. Walu
編輯Thomas Bustamante,Saulo de Matos,André L. S. Coelh
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/583/582085/582085.mp4
概述Presents a unique book dedicated to study in depth a widely appreciated and globally acknowledged legal philosophy.Includes comprehensive studies from experienced and senior scholars.Provides original
叢書名稱Law and Philosophy Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning; Essays on W. J. Walu Thomas Bustamante,Saulo de Matos,André L. S. Coelh Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if a
描述.This book provides a critical outlook on, and an inquiry into the practical implications of, the works of Professor W.J. Waluchow, one of the most important jurisprudence scholars of the early twenty-first century, while also reflecting on the interconnections between his legal theory and his theory of constitutional interpretation. It also features an interview with Waluchow, in which he responds to some of the chapters and shares a first-person perspective on his main philosophical ideas, how they emerged, and how they can be further developed and applied...The book makes a valuable contribution to contemporary legal philosophy by asking and providing different answers (from prominent legal philosophers and newer scholars in the field) to questions such as ‘How does Waluchow’s jurisprudence relate to his theories of legal reasoning and constitutional interpretation?’, ‘On what terms should we understand inclusive legal positivism?’, ‘Can inclusive legal positivism be reconciled with an interpretivist theory of adjudication?’, ‘How does it compare with Raz’s model of legal authority?’, ‘Can Waluchow’s notion of “community constitutional morality” be applied to contexts such as in
出版日期Book 2024
關(guān)鍵詞Waluchow; Legal Positivism; Inclusive Legal Positivism; Judicial Review; Common Law; Jurisprudence; Consti
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61879-6
isbn_softcover978-3-031-61881-9
isbn_ebook978-3-031-61879-6Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning被引頻次




書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning年度引用




書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning讀者反饋




書目名稱Law, Morality and Judicial Reasoning讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:22:00 | 只看該作者
Lessons from Waluchow: Necessity, Desirability, and Intelligibility of (Weak) Judicial Discretionof their best judgments as to the democratic community’s best judgments concerning the demands of moral truth.” Moreover, I disagree with him that there is: “No way of telling, among the various reasonable answers offered, which is right, or whose answer is best—or even better.”
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:22:28 | 只看該作者
Waluchow’s Theory of Constitutional Interpretation from a Rhetorical-Argumentative Point of Viewme process as the construction of idealized audiences which are utilized in rhetorical branches of argumentation theory to evaluate reasoning. I then go on to develop the rhetorical theory of judicial reasoning that, I believe, should stand behind Waluchow’s approach to judicial review.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:28:42 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:14:15 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:41:43 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:53:41 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:20:55 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:35:42 | 只看該作者
Thomas Bustamante,Saulo de Matos,André L. S. CoelhPresents a unique book dedicated to study in depth a widely appreciated and globally acknowledged legal philosophy.Includes comprehensive studies from experienced and senior scholars.Provides original
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:11:48 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 11:43
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
杭锦后旗| 崇文区| 台北县| 中山市| 遂宁市| 弥渡县| 溧阳市| 伊通| 东山县| 简阳市| 天祝| 泰州市| 无锡市| 上高县| 古田县| 台北市| 民丰县| 全州县| 文登市| 义马市| 黄山市| 涿州市| 乌鲁木齐市| 卓资县| 镇雄县| 宽甸| 揭阳市| 鄂温| 繁昌县| 邮箱| 大宁县| 麻城市| 沛县| 宁波市| 黎平县| 乌拉特后旗| 嘉荫县| 浦县| 昆明市| 南溪县| 会宁县|