Titlebook: Law and Reflexive Politics; Emilios A. Christodoulidis Book 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1998 conflict.constitution.demo

sulfonylureas

書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics被引頻次




書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics年度引用




書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics讀者反饋




書目名稱Law and Reflexive Politics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

藐視

KIN

Habermas on the ‘Interpenetration’ of Law and Politicsnamic of its own for it includes the debate over what it is about. Our very activity of entering public life to debate and provide competing interpretations over the meaning of ‘the public’, political and social life, turns the public sphere into an ‘essentially contested concept.’. One of the reaso

靈敏

American Civic Republicanismas a theory about the empowerment of . society. Civic republicanism is a theory that draws on a number of disciplines and integrates the insights into constitutional theory to suggest a thorough rethinking of the premises of constitutionalism. While the republicans all share the basic premise of the

最后一個

Dworkin and the Law as Forum of Principlecans.. I will say nothing about the division because I believe it misleading, but will treat Dworkin as both interpretivist and republican because, it is my claim, his major work . relies on law’s interpretative nature to provide a powerful statement of the containment thesis. This work not only set

paragon

Law, Society and Conflictonship of conflict and society. The second is the narrower one of the ‘juridification’ of conflict. I will engage in both debates, take cues from both, but also distance my position from both by re-working central assumptions from the point of view of systems-theory, or at least of my view of how sy

vibrant

Law and the Double Contingency of Conflictinction that only tends to confuse the issues in order to set up easy targets. This ideological use of the distinction mis-identifies phenomenal conflict with equilibrium, consensus and conservatism, and constitutive conflict with change. Associated with this, there has been a deep divide in much so

象形文字

Canvas

The Relationship of Conflict and Lawf the function of law: the connection with conflict. Note that it is this final connection with conflict that pivots my critique of republicanism, although the connection could not have been made in a way that brings out the weakness of the containment thesis, without the discussion of double contin

反叛者