Titlebook: Law and Economics in Europe; Foundations and Appl Klaus Mathis Book 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2014 Class-Action Lawsu

resilience

Forehead-Lift

Aurélien Portueseormal notation called the Secure Protocol Notation.Presents .Hop Integrity in the Internet. introduces a new security defense, hop integrity, that can be used against denial-of-service attacks in the Internet.? If a message that is part of a denial-of-service attack is originated by an adversarial h

愛(ài)花花兒憤怒

網(wǎng)絡(luò)添麻煩

矛盾

resilience, and activism, and considers how hope takes shapThis book provides a concise, interdisciplinary perspective on the emotion and practice of ‘hope‘. Based on the idea that hope is a dream that we carry in different ways,?the five chapters draw on the author’s original research and align it

RECUR

Never the Twain Shall Meet?inor role in Europe? As this article is also meant as a gloss, as “a propagandist tracet”,. I herein make use of my academic freedom to write freely also on controversial issues. If there is a grain of truth in what I am proposing here, it might help to de-mystify L&E theory and classify it to what

證實(shí)

To What Extent Is the Opposition Between Civil Law and Common Law Relevant for Law and Economics?levels. The present article will focus on the epistemological level. Is this divide relevant for assessing the relative value of law and economics in a legal system? It will be shown that this divide is largely irrelevant but that some characteristics of legal systems (instrumentality of law, autono

制定法律

Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning in Swiss and UK Courtsognized right to health, is growing. This increasing pressure on the policymakers to balance the requirements arising from the right to health and the inherent costs is evident. The cost of rights and liberties is an obvious convergence point between law and economics. This essay aims to illuminate

chuckle

Homo Economicus Versus Homo Iuridicusrudence, namely law and economics. In this essay I will claim that the interpretation of the Coase theorem adopted by the law and economics scholars in American jurisprudence, specifically the implementation of the price theory and welfare economics within the lines of the M. Friedman’s predictive s

investigate