找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism; An Associational Cri Matt Dawson Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 53227|回復(fù): 40
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:09:48 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism
副標(biāo)題An Associational Cri
編輯Matt Dawson
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/582/581772/581772.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism; An Associational Cri Matt Dawson Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pub
描述Influenced most notably by émile Durkheim and Zygmunt Bauman, Dawson outlines how this long neglected stream of socialist theory can help us more fully understand, and possibly move beyond, the problems of neoliberalism and our conceptions of political individualism.
出版日期Book 2013
關(guān)鍵詞democracy; neoliberalism; political sociology; socialism; sociology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003423
isbn_softcover978-1-349-43422-0
isbn_ebook978-1-137-00342-3
copyrightPalgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2013
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism被引頻次




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism年度引用




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism讀者反饋




書目名稱Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:09:54 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003423democracy; neoliberalism; political sociology; socialism; sociology
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:54:08 | 只看該作者
http://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/581772.jpg
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:03:05 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:01:57 | 只看該作者
Overview: Influenced most notably by émile Durkheim and Zygmunt Bauman, Dawson outlines how this long neglected stream of socialist theory can help us more fully understand, and possibly move beyond, the problems of neoliberalism and our conceptions of political individualism.978-1-349-43422-0978-1-137-00342-3
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:01:02 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:13:25 | 只看該作者
Privatization without Pluralism: The Late Modern Stated 6 expand upon the practical form that such a system could take. Here, attention is directed towards the state. In the next chapter the focus is economic activity and neoliberalism. These two are discussed separately partly because I reject, for reasons discussed below, the idea of the state being
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:18:12 | 只看該作者
Responsibility without Power: Neoliberalism and Economic Democracyg discussion about forms of work,. it does suggest the inability to entirely leave the economic behind for late modern political sociology. This issue is central to our discussion of libertarian socialism in late modernity. The question of how neoliberalism impacts political individualization, in te
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:50:25 | 只看該作者
Introductionmpatibility is seen to have empirical and normative grounding. The world of socialist theory, with its industrialized working-class, collective organization and the extreme poverty of the proletariat, is seen as irrelevant to an individualized, middle-class and post-scarcity world of consumers which
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:48:11 | 只看該作者
The Political Sociology of Late Modernity: Political Individualization intended to be synonyms; late modernity encompasses the logic of social processes while neoliberalism classifies a type of capitalist economy. Since both focus upon claims of globalization and individualism, it may seem plausible that there is an ‘elective affinity’ between them. However, as this c
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 09:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
南召县| 洪雅县| 鄯善县| 贵溪市| 教育| 山阴县| 乐昌市| 桂东县| 抚远县| 马鞍山市| 旌德县| 黄大仙区| 苗栗县| 根河市| 文化| 佳木斯市| 沁源县| 仁布县| 永靖县| 胶南市| 安泽县| 青神县| 汾阳市| 和平县| 翼城县| 安吉县| 和田县| 平潭县| 鹤壁市| 丁青县| 绩溪县| 沂南县| 上思县| 秦安县| 阳曲县| 绥芬河市| 崇阳县| 沙洋县| 玉林市| 扶沟县| 武冈市|