Titlebook: Language, Logic, and Computation; 13th International T Aybüke ?zgün,Yulia Zinova Conference proceedings 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

hexagon

書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation被引頻次




書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation年度引用




書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation讀者反饋




書目名稱Language, Logic, and Computation讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

報(bào)復(fù)

阻擋

daredevil

G-spot

Bridging the?Gap Between Formal Semantics and?Neurolinguistics: The Case of?the?N400 and?the?LPPAt the semantic level we combine de Groote’s continuation-based version of Montague semantics with van Eijck’s Incremental Dynamics enriched with frames. We analyze them in terms of complex properties that apply both to the semantic and the discourse level and which combine world knowledge with synt

雪崩

Distributional Analysis of?Polysemous Function Words word meaning by observing occurrence contexts in large corpora and which is in principle well situated to model polysemy. Nevertheless, function words were traditionally considered as impossible to analyze distributionally due to their highly flexible usage patterns..We establish that ., the most r

外科醫(yī)生

It is not the Obvious Question that a Cleft Addresses than its canonical counterpart. My analysis is inspired by naturally occurring examples from German novels. It combines an adapted version of Roberts’ (.) QUD stack and Velleman et al.’s (.) approach to clefts. In particular, I present a model that includes implicit and potential questions into the

饑荒

Commentary

Embedded Questions are Exhaustive Alright, but…. The readings available in combination with the concessive particle combination . ‘a(chǎn)lright…but’ and the Q-adverb . ‘partially’ provide evidence that embedded .-interrogatives under veridical and distributive . ‘know’ have a weakly exhaustive (WE) reading as their basic semantic interpretation [.].

gratify