Titlebook: Language in the Legal Process; Janet Cotterill (Lecturer in Language and Communic Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Pu

鳥場(chǎng)

書目名稱Language in the Legal Process影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Language in the Legal Process影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Language in the Legal Process網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Language in the Legal Process網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Language in the Legal Process被引頻次




書目名稱Language in the Legal Process被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Language in the Legal Process年度引用




書目名稱Language in the Legal Process年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Language in the Legal Process讀者反饋




書目名稱Language in the Legal Process讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

推崇

Whose Voice Is It? Invented and Concealed Dialogue in Written Records of Verbal Evidence Produced byterviews . suspects and records of statements made . suspects. Since the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE, 1984) which was introduced following a spate of claims that those accused of crimes were frequently ‘verballed’ (that is, verbal evidence was fabricated by police officers), the police in

PARA

Textual Barriers to United States Immigration bounded, nationalist space. We see and read news accounts of the border patrol holding back the ‘flood’ of illegal immigrants from Latin America. Accounts of these Latin Americans trying to reach the USA — sometimes dying of heat or cold in the desert-like land of the south-western states or chased

CHANT

The Language and Law of Product Warnings— for a variety of reasons. Sometimes they are poorly designed; or they might be defectively manufactured. Increasingly, however, manufacturers and sellers of products are held liable because they failed to warn consumers of potential risks or dangers associated with their use.

inspiration

‘I Just Need to Ask Somebody Some Questions’: Sensitivities in Domestic Dispute Callsnd disparaging remarks are frequent. Simply put, calls about domestic disputes are common sites for interactional trouble between citizens and police call-takers. One reason for this, identified three decades ago (Reiss, 1971), is that citizens lack an adequate understanding of the distinction betwe

epicardium

陶醉

‘Three’s a Crowd’: Shifting Dynamics in the Interpreted Interviewting alters the processes and, possibly, the outcomes of trials. However, long before a case comes to trial, an arrest is made and the suspect is interviewed. It is this interview that is the ‘upstream’ event that sets in motion everything that leads to the trial, months later and miles ‘downstream’

analogous

The Miranda Warnings and Linguistic Coercion: The Role of Footing in the Interrogation of a Limited-stions. Yet the speech situation of the police interview or police interrogation is perhaps a more coercive one from the standpoint of asymmetrical power relationships between interlocutors, since there is no judge present to control the behaviour of the interrogators. It is not by chance that inter

致命

‘Just One More Time …’: Aspects of Intertextuality in the Trials of O. J. Simpsonally been subject to a large number of retellings in a variety of contexts, including police interviews, grand jury and plea-bargaining sessions as well as pretrial indictment and arraignment hearings.

Priapism