Titlebook: Language and the Right to Fair Hearing in International Criminal Trials; Catherine S. Namakula Book 2014 Springer International Publishing

Glucocorticoids

Book 2014presentation and the perception of the evidence, hence jeopardizing the foundations of a fair trial..The author concludes that language fair trial rights are priority rights situated in the minimum guarantees of fair criminal trial; the obligation of the court to ensure fair trial or accord the accu

食物

Introduction,ls of 1945 and 1946, which were to foster accountability for the gruesome violations of World War II. The 1990s beheld the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territo

metropolitan

gangrene

Ovulation

Language Rights in the Minimum Guarantees of Fair Criminal Trial,ments already recognised by international binding rules. It distinguishes the status of linguistic rights of participants in an international criminal trial, as actionable rights, by demonstrating the significance of language to the fulfilment of the minimum guarantees of fair hearing. Expounding th

草率女

Understanding the Role of Translation in Trial Fairness,nstitute translation of translations, this subject dominates the language debate in international criminal justice. By way of empirical research and analysis of existing scholarly work on the subject of language in the legal process, it evaluates the efficacy of translation in eliminating linguistic

殘廢的火焰

Melanocytes

Gorilla

Catherine S. Namakulaments of the anti-Semite’s psyche is a pervasive one in psychoanalytic theorising on the subject. The general notion is that psychic life is made up of contradictory unconscious impulses or ideas sufficiently defended against so that they can be organised into reason-ably integrated patterns. Under

灌輸

Catherine S. Namakulayears, as noted in Chapter 3, this history was a relatively secret one, as the psychoanalysts set about rebuilding their organisation and their myths, specifically presenting themselves — like many other Germans — as always having been victims and possibly opponents of Nazism. The debate over whethe