Titlebook: Language Constructs for Describing Features; Proceedings of the F Stephen Gilmore,Mark Ryan Conference proceedings 2001 Springer-Verlag Lon

考博

強(qiáng)制性

Antioxidant

Structuring Telecommunications Features,o service definition languages, . (Architectural Notions In Service Engineering) andC . (C. Representation Employing Structured Specifications). A. is a mainly textual notation for defining services through the composition of simpler features, right down to the most elementary behaviours.C . is a ma

搜尋

choroid

Use Case Maps as a Feature Description Notation,rlying abstract components. This particular view proved very useful in the description of a wide range of reactive and telecommunications systems. This paper presents some of the most interesting constructs and benefits of the notation in relation to a question on a User Requirements Notation recent

BURSA

An incremental method for the design of feature-oriented systems,r in an unpredictable way. In order to find the best way to combine features, a major difficulty is to foresee or to discover when a feature can disrupt an another one. Once such an interaction has been analysed, it still remains to define the best combination between the involved features. As this

abduction

Confound

Proving feature non-interaction with Alternating-Time Temporal Logic, considerable literature is devoted to this ‘feature interaction problem’ [.,.]. One approach to demonstrating that features do not interact undesirably is to equip them with properties which are intended to hold of a system having the feature [.]. In this view, a feature is a pair (., ?) consisting

Paraplegia

Algebraic Treatment of Feature-oriented Systems,nformally understood by the researchers of the domain, the way, they handle it, strongly depends on the field of investigation they decide to work on (formal method application, architectural conception, technological research ... ). In this article, we focus on how formally specifying and studying

integral