Titlebook: Labelled Non-Classical Logics; Luca Viganò Book 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2000 calculus.complexity.modal logic.proof.

hexagon

書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics被引頻次




書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics年度引用




書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics讀者反饋




書目名稱Labelled Non-Classical Logics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

BILL

PRO

Labelled Natural Deduction Systems for Propositional Modal Logicsstems with inheritance of theorems. Moreover, it allows modular proofs of metatheoretical properties, in that these proofs, along with the presentations themselves, are parameterized over the properties of the relations.

音樂(lè)等

Labelled Natural Deduction Systems for Propositional Non-Classical Logicsnt of a wide range of non-classical operators (□, ?, relevant and intuitionistic implication, non-classical negation, etc.), where we base our presentations on an abstract classification of non-classical operators as ‘universal’ or ‘existential’, and associated general metatheorems. We proceed as follows.

母豬

phase-2-enzyme

Labelled Natural Deduction Systems for Quantified Modal Logicsarbitrarily (varying domains), or do the same objects exist in every world (constant domains), or are objects possibly created (increasing domains) or destroyed (decreasing domains) when moving to accessible worlds?

Ordnance

Discussionhierarchical structuring), and have modular metatheoretical properties, in particular soundness and completeness, and normalization of derivations and a subformula property, which we can exploit to delineate advantages and limitations of our approach..

瑣碎

Complexity of Proof Search in K, T, K4 and S4ned with the soundness and completeness of our systems with respect to the corresponding Kripke semantics, tell us that the provability (validity) problems for the modal logics K, T, K4 and S4 are decidable in PSPACE.

coagulate

Discussionbounds by combining restrictions on the structural rules of our labelled sequent systems with an analysis of the accessibility relation of the corresponding Kripke frames. Furthermore, we have shown that as a by-product of our analysis we can obtain justifications (and in some cases refinements) of the rules of standard sequent systems.

jarring

Introduction and Preliminariesr all logics in the family, and a labelling algebra, which we extend to generate systems for particular logics. Now we use our framework to develop a proof-theoretical method for bounding the computational complexity of the decision problem for a number of these logics.