Titlebook: Knowing the Structure of Nature; Essays on Realism an Stathis Psillos Book 2009 Stathis Psillos 2009 metaphysics.philosophy of science.scie

無法修復(fù)

書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature被引頻次




書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature年度引用




書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature讀者反饋




書目名稱Knowing the Structure of Nature讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

febrile

Book 2009In this sequel to the highly acclaimed Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth , Psillos discusses recent developments in scientific realism and explores realist theses and commitments. He examines the structuralist turn in the philosophy of science and offers a framework within which inference to the best explanation can be defended.

豎琴

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234666metaphysics; philosophy of science; science; truth

羅盤

http://image.papertrans.cn/k/image/543817.jpg

點(diǎn)燃

affinity

Simply the Best: A Case for Abductionive Induction (EI) and the Method of Hypothesis, I will try to show that abduction, suitably understood as inference to the best explanation (IBE), offers the best description of scientific method and solves the foregoing problem in the best way: it strikes the best balance between ampliation and epistemic warrant.

squander

Thinking About the Ultimate Argument for Realism authors of the argument, however, did not put an extra stress on . predictions, which, as Musgrave (1988) makes plain, is the litmus test for the ability of any approach to science to explain the success of science.

中古

MUT

NEG