Titlebook: Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics; Tatjana Vi?ak Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:06:32

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics影響因子(影響力)

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics被引頻次

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics被引頻次學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics年度引用

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics年度引用學(xué)科排名

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics讀者反饋

書(shū)目名稱Killing Happy Animals: Explorations in Utilitarian Ethics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:02:43

The Replaceability Argument,cussed. If other authors discuss the Replaceability Argument it is always a reaction to Singer. Therefore, my exploration of the Replaceability Argument will be presented in dialogue with Singer’s take on the issue.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:24:56

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:16:48

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:00:45

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:52:51

Animals and the Harm of Death,nto account is compatible with sending the child to school, but not the dog. The reason is that the dog would not benefit from being sent to school. So, different interests can justify different treatment.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:06:18

The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Serieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/k/image/542719.jpg

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:12:27

Book 2013Is it acceptable to kill an animal that has been granted a pleasant life? This book rigorously explores the moral basis of the ideal of animal-friendly animal husbandry and sheds new light on utilitarian moral theory by pointing out the assumptions and implications of two different versions of utilitarianism, with surprising conclusions.

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:30:07

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137286277ethics; identity; Moral; morality; Utilitarianism

只看該作者 · 發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:43:05

		自動(dòng)登錄	找回密碼
密碼			To register

關(guān)于派博傳思			派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站			友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹	公司地理位置	論文服務(wù)流程	影響因子官網(wǎng)	吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng)	大講堂	北京大學(xué)	Oxford Uni.	Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革	期刊點(diǎn)評(píng)	投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)	SCIENCEGARD	IMPACTFACTOR	派博系數(shù)	清華大學(xué)	Yale Uni.	Stanford Uni.
\|Archiver\|手機(jī)版\|小黑屋\| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 14:16
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved