Titlebook: Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought; James Giles (Professor of Philosophy, Tutor at Mad Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

Hallucination

書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought被引頻次




書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought年度引用




書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought讀者反饋




書目名稱Kierkegaard and Japanese Thought讀者反饋學科排名

Mortar

,A Short History of Kierkegaard’s Reception in Japan,ve had upon the development of Japanese thinking or Japanese philosophy. This is to investigate critically Japanese thinking from the standpoint of Kierkegaard’s ideas. The second takes the opposite view, which considers how Japanese ideas can contribute to an understanding of Kierkegaard, or how it

小教堂

Japanese Pure Land Buddhism and Kierkegaard,onopolized by the nobility, in the Kamakura period more popular schools of Buddhism arose. This reformation was largely a result of the great numbers of political disturbances and natural disasters that characterized the end of the Heian period (746–1185). People believed that the age of hopelessnes

delta-waves

遺產(chǎn)

cacophony

Truth, Paradox, and Silence: Hakuin and Kierkegaard,e he tells us that Kierkegaard never attained enlightenment in the Zen sense. Barrett does not offer much in the way of evidence for his case, and even if he did, it is unlikely to generate anything more than a rather tenuous conclusion, given the highly subjective nature of the issue. It is like sa

dendrites

騷動

The Religious Thought of Nishida and Kierkegaard, underpinning their thought is the idea of religious existence. It is this basic commonality which I wish to focus on in this chapter. Eiko Hanaoko has considered the relationship between the philosophical thought of Nishida and Kierkegaard in the previous chapter. Here — in what I hope will complem

看法等

可能性