Titlebook: Karl Jaspers’ Philosophy and Psychopathology; Thomas Fuchs,Thiemo Breyer,Christoph Mundt Book 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New Yor

MUTE

invulnerable

Psychopathology and the Modern Age. Karl Jaspers Reads H?lderlinetzsche, and Max Weber. Remarkably, this view also surfaces in his . when Jaspers compares Heidegger’s famous interpretation of H?lderlin with the edition published by Hellingrath two decades earlier. Jaspers did not read the elegy “Bread and Wine” in prophetic terms as Heidegger did. Instead he saw

講個(gè)故事逗他

Hermeneutical and Dialectical Thinking in Psychiatry and the Contribution of Karl Jasperssights into his psychiatric thinking. After introducing these concepts (e.g., understanding as contrasted with explanation) on a theoretical level, the question about the applicability in the psychotherapeutic context (i.e., in concrete encounters between doctors and patients), is discussed. The ele

小溪

Phenomenological Intuitionism and Its Psychiatric Impact other hand. Our line of reasoning challenges two widespread views. First, we argue that Husserl’s conception of an intentional analysis referring to a methodically “purified” human consciousness requires an account of what we call “rational hermeneutics,” as distinct from a more conventional indivi

intrude

IDEAS

Brain Mythologiesy on his rebuttal of naturalistic reductionism, which is an attempt to reduce mental phenomena and instances of mental illness to the brain’s organic substrate. Psychopathology as a science is based, by contrast, on the assumption that mental abnormalities bear a meaningful and gestalt-like characte

malign

死亡

Perspectival Knowing Karl Jaspers and Ronald N. Giere view within which alone evidence can be interpreted and assessed; (2) this early position of Jaspers (already present in the 1913 edition) has found indirect support recently in a carefully reasoned book by the prestigious philosopher of natural science, Ronald N. Giere, entitled . (2006); and (3)

赤字

Karl Jaspers on Primary Delusional Experiences of Schizophrenics: His Concept of Delusion Compared tn of delusion as pathologically falsified judgements. The following differences to Jaspers concept of delusion are shown: 1. Contrary to the general definition of schizophrenic delusion in DSM-IV-TM as enormous beliefs usually involving misinterpretations of perceptions on experiences according to J

膽汁

Delusion and Double Book-Keepingl introduction, the characteristic feature of derealization is discussed and related to what Bleuler called “double book-keeping.” Then, the methodological relevance of phenomenology and the similarity between delusional states and phenomenological imagination and bracketing (as emphasized by author