Titlebook: Kant‘s Transcendental Imagination; Gary Banham Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005 bibliography.

plasma

Synthesis, Intuition and Mathematics,d the notion of “immediacy”. A further rationale for favouring the criteria of singularity in the literature generally has been that it is often taken to be the case that it is this criteria that is most important in Kant’s treatment of mathematics as a body of synthetic . truths..

palliate

Substance, Causality and Community,ynamical principles in both these respects, showing how they connect to Kant’s discussions of dynamical questions in his “pre-Critical” writings and also how the arguments of the Analogies build on the discussions of the transcendental synthesis of imagination in the Transcendental Deduction and the chapter on schematism.

Obverse

Magisterial

cal significance. This work presents a detailed argument for restoring transcendental psychology to a central place in the interpretation of Kant‘s Analytic, in the process providing a detailed response to more ‘austere‘ analytic readings.978-1-349-51310-9978-0-230-50119-5

細節(jié)

COLON

Apperception and Synthesis, with minimal reference to the machinery of synthesis. The prime exemplar of such an approach is Strawson’s description of the strategies for a transcendental argument that will justify the notion of objectivity from what seems to be required even to have a conception of consciousness itself. The na

蛤肉

eardrum

Schematism and Imagination,nale for this argument in Heidegger’s case rests upon his conviction that Kant discovers the solution to the question of the ground of relational connection between substances in something that goes beyond the condition of substantiality and even that of the divine, namely temporality itself..

aquatic

率直

Gary Banhamithin the world of his — Dedekind’s — thought? Is this what Dedekind wants us to believe? The second mystery revolves around Dedekind’s famous essay on continuity, .. We uncover the mystery by asking, “How can Dedekind claim to have captured — in his definition of ‘real number’ — the essence of the