Titlebook: Kant as Philosophical Theologian; Bernard M. G. Reardon Book 1988 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1988 Chri

coerce

書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian被引頻次




書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian年度引用




書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian讀者反饋




書目名稱Kant as Philosophical Theologian讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

鐵塔等

2947-0242 s attempt to prove divine existence by logical argument, it also left no room for ‘revelation‘ in the traditional sense. Yet Kant himself, who was brought up in Lutheran pietism, certainly believed in God, and could fairly be described as a religious man. But he held that religion can be based only

共和國(guó)

易于交談

The So-Called Proofs of Divine Existence larger work, in view of complaints about its obscurity, but it in no way departs from the . standpoint.. A second, revised edition of the latter was published in 1787, although how far it improves on the original remains a matter of opinion, and many students of Kant have seen no good reason for preferring it..

Ordeal

神化怪物

Mere僅僅

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08395-4Christianity; god; Immanuel Kant; philosophy of religion; religion; theology

Spinous-Process

Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1988

柔美流暢

不合

Introduction: The Young Kant — Pietism and Rationalismncurred tutelage and to trust instead to his own understanding. Not that this new liberty had already been attained; by no means. ‘But’, says Kant, ‘we live, if not in an enlightened age altogether, then surely in one of enlightenment in which the free-ranging intelligence is now active and abroad.’