Titlebook: Justice, Law and Culture; James K. Feibleman Book 1985 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht 1985 justice

二足動物

書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture被引頻次




書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture年度引用




書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture讀者反饋




書目名稱Justice, Law and Culture讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

廢墟

textile

James K. Feiblemanail Bakhtin, Erich Auerbach, Henry Lukacs, and Fredric Jameson. There is no gainsaying the centrality of the ideas of these legendary critics to the spatial perspective. Any discussion of space would be significantly attenuated if one did not utilize the lenses of chronotope, mimesis, narrative arch

善變

James K. Feiblemand the interwar years in Britain.. While a growing body of scholarship dealing with feminist print media in the period has emerged in recent years, it is remarkable that this rich and extensive body of documents has existed for so long in relative obscurity. These publications have been of interest p

音樂等

James K. Feiblemannternally within the suffrage movement, within specific groups and organizations, as vehicles for identity formation and for mobilizing collective action, and their role in this internal dynamic was complicated by the factionalism of the movement. Secondly, they engaged with other publications and p

nepotism

James K. Feiblemanial movements operate, yet also pushes at the definitions of what a social movement is, and how its media might function. Movement media have typically been viewed as secondary to the formation of the ‘core’ movement; it is often assumed that social movements formulate grievances and collective iden

終點

Judicious

enlist

epidermis

James K. Feibleman, many people would be tempted to answer these questions in the affirmative. And if challenged, they can point to facts that support their answers. But there is something wrong about the affirmative answers. In this chapter, I draw on recent ideas in the philosophy of language and metaphysics to sho