Titlebook: Justice Through Punishment?; Critique of the Just Barbara Hudson Textbook 1987Latest edition Macmillan Publishers Limited 1987 criminal jus

柔軟

無(wú)法破譯

Reform, Rehabilitation, Welfare and Treatment: Concepts, Confusion and Critique,’. But rehabilitation? Apart from being something of a parvenu concept in penological discourse, rehabilitation seems not so essential to the idea of punishment; rather, it seems a tangential aim of the application of penal sanctions, an outcome which though it may be desirable in itself, may be una

難理解

The Justice Model,partly because it seemed to offer the prospect of progress in correcting the abuses of rehabilitationism, and partly because, having not pursued their criticism of prison regimes and procedures through to an agenda for abolition of imprisonment, there was a vacuum left in the area of radical-left re

一再遛

Non-Legal Factors and the Criminal Justice Process,es, and it created vast, unwieldy infrastructures to develop treatment programmes of all kinds, from the pragmatic and banal to the science fictional. None the less, in reality most offenders continued to be dealt with by fines or by short prison sentences, disposals with no treatment projects, no r

Intuitive

Problems of Juvenile Justice,juvenile justice system is over-expanded and over-interventionist; it is a mixture of repressive welfarism and straightforward punitiveness that locks up too many young people, with little or no impact on juvenile crime.

拘留

Conclusions and Ways Forward,e it from its co-option by ‘get tough’ politicians, there has now appeared a small crop of demystifying critiques. According to these, the justice model may have been dreamed up by liberals, but it expresses a conservative consciousness. In welcoming its agenda of limited punishment, the stripping a

馬籠頭

Reform, Rehabilitation, Welfare and Treatment: Concepts, Confusion and Critique,d to provide alternative moral foundations as well as policy aims of punishment. These three principles are retribution, deterrence and rehabilitation. Of these, the first two have been included in discussions of penal philosophy down the ages and have always, to varying relative degrees, been incor

GRE

anticipate

Putting Theory into Practice,dministrators and the new pedagogic professionals, so too the justice model was articulated at a time when it provided a much sought after blueprint for a loose confederation of politicians, legislators, academics, and professionals within the criminal justice, penal and social work establishments.

strain