Titlebook: Justice and Health Care; Earl E. Shelp Book 19811st edition D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1981 health.health policy.iss

優(yōu)雅

Justice and Health Care: Historical Perspectives and Precedentslearned journals and the meetings of professional societies. Because it is so old, spanning more than a score of centuries, the history of medical ethics cannot be easily summarized nor can it be captured in altogether reliable generalizations. Nevertheless, there do seem to be persistent leitmotifs

affluent

束縛

Justice and Prenatal Lifeticularly within the Roman Catholic tradition, have long reinforced a high regard for prenatal life. However, neither the social condition which could have encouraged a view of fetal life as worthy of protection nor the medical breakthroughs which could have provided detailed knowledge of the exigen

Noctambulant

Justice and the Defective Newbornwas held in 1975. Even before this formal recognition of the specialty, ominous ethical clouds were gathering around it. Two years before, pediatricians Raymond Duff and A. G. M. Campbell reported that, in their newborn intensive care nursery, treatment was deliberately discontinued for some infants

有發(fā)明天才

Justice and the Dying issues concerning the dying. Many works concerned with the dying, even by non-utilitarians, emphasize considerations of benevolence rather than those of justice. The extent to which one believes justice is a major consideration depends on one’s concept of justice. The following discussion is framed

使習(xí)慣于

Health Care Allocations: Responses to the Unjust, the Unfortunate, and the Undesirablean to propose particular answers. As a consequence, (1) I do not endorse a particular system of health care allocation nor (2) do I advocate a single ethical theory that will allow one then to derive a system of health care allocations. Rather, I address some of the bothersome difficulties that atte

Scleroderma

Priorities in the Allocation of Health Care Resourcesoted increasing attention to issues in biomedical ethics in public policy. Public policies, defined as “whatever governments choose to do or not to do” ([7], p. 1), typically involve regulation (e.g., prohibition and control of an activity) and allocation and distribution of benefits (e.g., goods an

公式

Health Care for the Haves and Have Nots: Toward a Just Basis of Distribution national commitment (in such programs as Medicaid and Medicare) to providing adequate health care for the indigent. Despite this commitment, and the great costs incurred in trying to meet it, the problem of providing adequate health care for the medically indigent (the have-nots) at an affordable c

抗原

恃強(qiáng)凌弱的人