找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Jurisdiction Over Crimes on Board Aircraft; Sami Shubber Book 1973 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1973 air law.international ai

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Clique
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 05:20:17 | 只看該作者
The Final Clauses of the Tokyo ConventionThe final clauses of the Tokyo Convention have been embodied in Chapter VII of the Convention. Chapter VII came into existence at the Tokyo Conference, in 1963, at the final stage of the drafting process of the Convention..
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 10:18:53 | 只看該作者
Jurisdiction over Crimes on Board Aircraft under International Lawhus, registration of aircraft, like that of ships, establishes the link of nationality between the aircraft and the registering State. The national State of a ship or aircraft is, of course, entitled under international law to protect, exercise jurisdiction and subject such ship or aircraft to its laws.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:27:11 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 17:37:59 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:08:34 | 只看該作者
The Historical Development of the Notion of a Convention Applicable to Crimes in Aircraftly said that: “There are very few subjects connected with the law of the Air on which lawyers have written so much or which they have discussed so often at International Conferences as Crimes on Aircraft.”
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:08:51 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:19:26 | 只看該作者
The Material Scope of the Tokyo Convention offences: offences of a political nature, and those which involve racial and religious discrimination. Although the crime of hijacking of aircraft is an offence on board aircraft, the Convention has devoted one chapter, consisting of Article 11 only, to deal with it..
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:51:38 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:06:44 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 18:04:38 | 只看該作者
The Historical Development of the Notion of a Convention Applicable to Crimes in Aircraftw should apply. As early as 1902, the French jurist P. Fauchille, one of the pioneers of air law, discussed the question which State was competent to exercise jurisdiction over offences and other acts occurring on board aircraft in flight. The question was also considered by international bodies, du
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 02:36
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
平遥县| 瑞丽市| 离岛区| 密云县| 临沂市| 凯里市| 昌宁县| 田阳县| 兴安县| 随州市| 德清县| 黄石市| 双牌县| 汝阳县| 牡丹江市| 土默特右旗| 格尔木市| 阜南县| 德安县| 当涂县| 论坛| 华坪县| 中牟县| 梅河口市| 吉安县| 遂宁市| 抚顺市| 景泰县| 达孜县| 丰县| 明星| 张家界市| 霍城县| 肇源县| 喜德县| 闵行区| 丽江市| 措勤县| 化德县| 东兰县| 新津县|