Titlebook: Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror; The Case of the Sydn David Tait,Jane Goodman-Delahunty Book 2017 The Editor(s) (i

POL

書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror被引頻次




書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror年度引用




書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror讀者反饋




書目名稱Juries, Science and Popular Culture in the Age of Terror讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Aesthete

Animating the Bomber: The Sydney Bomber Trial,nd of interacting with computer games can imbue evidentiary animations with added credibility. Appreciating these aspects of the medium can help all participants in legal proceedings to better assess the persuasive benefits and judgemental risks of courtroom animations.

牛的細(xì)微差別

Assessing Unfair Prejudice from Extremist Images in Terrorism Trials,f unfairly prejudicing the jury against the defendants and that research on the effectiveness of standard jury instructions showed they were inadequate to manage the risk. The presiding judge rejected this submission. On appeal, admission of the gruesome evidence was upheld on the grounds that jury discomfort did not amount to unfair prejudice.

嚴(yán)峻考驗

Research Aims and Methods, placing a bomb on a train that exploded after he alighted, killing innocent commuters in the centre of Sydney. Across two related studies, we aimed to test the effect on jury reasoning and conviction rates of interactive virtual environments, jury instructions on the appropriate use of expert evidence and individual versus group decision-making.

使困惑

肉身

output

Book 2017n confronted by defendants charged with terrorism? Do they scrutinize prosecution cases carefully, or does emotion trump reason once the spectre of terrorism is invoked? This book examines these questions from a range of disciplinary perspectives. The authors look at the how jurors in terrorism tria

FOVEA

Terrorist Trials: Forensic Science and the Trial Process,sm-related offences, both roles are increasingly likely to be carried out in an internationalised, collaborative environment, where far greater attention will be focused on the quality of the forensic science and its application in the investigation stage, as well as in the courtroom.

archetype

容易做

Displaying the Bomb on the Train: The Challenge of Preparing Visual Evidence,ther triers of fact can trust. Projects such as the Sydney Bomber study are moving towards providing useful guidelines for developers of such reconstructions and ensuring that in the future, this technology is used appropriately.