找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium; An Institutional and Tim Bunjevac Book 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Sprin

[復制鏈接]
查看: 53512|回復: 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:55:34 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium
副標題An Institutional and
編輯Tim Bunjevac
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/502/501416/501416.mp4
概述Develops an original court governance policy framework for judge-managed courts based on synthesis of international best practices.Can be used as a policy manual to assist court administration scholar
叢書名稱Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
圖書封面Titlebook: Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium; An Institutional and Tim Bunjevac Book 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Sprin
描述This book is a comparative study of judge-managed court systems across Australia, Europe and North America. This book makes an original contribution to the literature of court administration by providing a framework for examining court-service models of judicial councils, the policymaking bodies of courts and tribunals. This book promises to assist court administration scholars, judicial leaders, and policymakers in devising more effective organizational solutions to the contemporary challenges of judicial self-governance.?.The author Dr. Tim Bunjevac offers a nuanced elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration and a model institutional framework of court governance, comparing key Australian and international models of court administration, including the Australian Federal and two state court systems, Irish, English, Canadian and Dutch models. With a close case study, the author puts his sharpest focus on the Victoria, Australia, which introduced a judicial council in 2014.?.This book does an innovative job of proposing a new elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration. This book proposes that the likely success of any court system reform ultim
出版日期Book 2020
關鍵詞Judicial review; Judicial administration; Self-Governance; Constitutional law; Administrative law; Public
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6506-3
isbn_softcover978-981-33-6508-7
isbn_ebook978-981-33-6506-3Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902
issn_series 1534-6781
copyrightThe Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium被引頻次




書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium年度引用




書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium讀者反饋




書目名稱Judicial Self-Governance in the New Millennium讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:11:12 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:49:01 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:12:15 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:01:50 | 只看該作者
Tim Bunjevacerg unter Verwendung von Schacht?fen einer zur Zeitenwende üblichen Bauart und mittels einer damals vermutlich gebr?uchlichen Arbeitsweise nennenswerte Mengen kohlenstoffreicheren Stahls und auch Roheisens zu gewinnen. Damit wurde in übereinstimmung mit den bekannten thermodynamischen Grundlagen ers
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:51:44 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:07:22 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:01:51 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:43:26 | 只看該作者
Judicial Control of Court Administration, with an analysis of the traditional arguments in favour of greater judicial control of court administration, before moving on to propose a new elaboration of judicial accountability in court administration.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:06:14 | 只看該作者
Models of Court Governance,ustralian, Irish, English, Canadian federal and Dutch models. The analysis is used to identify the key features of each model and inform the development of a court governance analytical policy framework in Chap. . of the study.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 03:54
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
贺州市| 易门县| 黑水县| 锡林郭勒盟| 丹江口市| 磐安县| 双柏县| 车致| 安徽省| 利津县| 宝丰县| 修水县| 彭泽县| 晋州市| 馆陶县| 阿坝| 西充县| 宜丰县| 阜平县| 同德县| 汕头市| 龙泉市| 改则县| 阳信县| 额敏县| 孝感市| 唐海县| 璧山县| 定南县| 永善县| 镇安县| 阜宁县| 神农架林区| 青龙| 吉水县| 安乡县| 武山县| 手机| 大石桥市| 鄂州市| 大安市|