找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State; Jurgen de Poorter,Ernst Hirsch Ballin,Saskia Lavri Book 2019 T.M

[復制鏈接]
查看: 19435|回復: 41
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:26:57 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State
編輯Jurgen de Poorter,Ernst Hirsch Ballin,Saskia Lavri
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/502/501413/501413.mp4
概述Constitutes a state-of-the-art overview of academic literature on governance in the administrative state and the role of the judiciary therein.Analyses and compares the role of the judiciary in the ad
圖書封面Titlebook: Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State;  Jurgen de Poorter,Ernst Hirsch Ballin,Saskia Lavri Book 2019 T.M
描述.This book deals with one of the greatest challenges for the judiciary in the 21st century. It reflects on the judiciary’s role in reviewing administrative discretion in the administrative state; a role that can no longer solely be understood from the traditional doctrine of the Trias Politica..Traditionally, courts review acts of administrative bodies implying a degree of discretion with quite some restraint. Typically it is reviewed whether the decision is non-arbitrary or whether there is no manifest error of assessment. The question arises though as to whether the concern regarding ensuring the non-arbitrary character of the exercise of administrative power, which is frequently performed at a distance from political bodies, goes far enough to guarantee that the administration exercises its powers in a legitimate way..This publication searches for new modes of judicial review of administrative discretion exercised in the administrative state. It links state-of-the-art academic research on the role of courts in the administrative state with the daily practice of the higher and lower administrative courts struggling with their position in the evolving administrative state..The boo
出版日期Book 2019
關鍵詞Judicary; Administrative State; Independent Agencies; Discretion; Review; Restraint Review; Standard of Re
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-307-8
isbn_softcover978-94-6265-309-2
isbn_ebook978-94-6265-307-8
copyrightT.M.C. Asser press and the authors 2019
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State被引頻次




書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State年度引用




書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State讀者反饋




書目名稱Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:41:46 | 只看該作者
Constitutional Genealogy of Judicial Review in the Administrative Stateough democratic procedures, and that the administration is therefore primarily subject to political, not judicial, oversight. Public administration has however become increasingly complex, and rule-making occurs more and more by specialized administrative agencies. This high degree of professionalis
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:06:16 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:25:25 | 只看該作者
Judicial Scrutiny of Regulatory Decisions at the UK’s Specialist Competition Appeal Tribunal feature of the UK’s regulatory and competition law landscape. Unlike ordinary courts, the CAT’s bench combines legal and non-legal expertise in areas such as economics, business and accountancy. Despite its specialist nature, however, and contrary to what intuition would suggest, the CAT does not a
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:44:18 | 只看該作者
A Future Perspective on Judicial Review of Generally Binding Regulations in the Netherlands: Towards role the administrative courts are supposed to play in the administrative state. A different approach seems possible if we look at the aim of judicial review from a different constitutional point of view and consider judicial review to be animated by the concern to ensure the non-disproportionate c
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:34:54 | 只看該作者
Judicial Review in Dutch Environmental Law: General Observationstrine, which is also referred to as the limited judicial review of administrative actions, is the subject of dynamic developments. The exact role that the court should play in the review of administrative actions remains a contentious issue. The focus of this contribution is the relationship between
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:12:31 | 只看該作者
Judicial Review in Dutch Environmental Law; from the Judge’s Perspectiveers must be seen as a way of implementing the legislature’s decisions is criticized. The model for judicial review has been reanalysed as part of the Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State (AJD)’s project on a more comprehensive form of judicial review. The reason for this is t
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:31:38 | 只看該作者
Who Guards the Guardians? Judicial Oversight of the Authority Consumer and Market’s Energy Regulatiolation. The Dutch . (Authority for Consumers and Markets, hereafter: ACM) has been provided broad discretionary powers to regulate the energy market. This chapter examines the way in which the Dutch . (Appeals Tribunal for Trade and Industry, hereafter: CBB) has reviewed energy regulations. This cha
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:55:26 | 只看該作者
Judicial Review in Administrative Governance: A Theoretical Framework for Comparative Analysistive. It proceeds from the premise that administrative governance cannot sustain itself without maintaining a legitimating connection to the .—legislative, executive, and judicial—in some historically or legally recognizable sense. Judicial review, together with political oversight by legislative an
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:13:45 | 只看該作者
landmark of socialism into a subsidiary of a global steel company. We will in particular reconstruct the employment restructuring across the three phases 1990–1998, 1999–2003, 2004–2006). During the first period of restructuring in 1990–1998, restructuring happened mainly naturally by a reduced inta
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 10:22
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
晋城| 沧源| 喀喇| 龙口市| 津南区| 忻城县| 永城市| 团风县| 临桂县| 昭觉县| 曲周县| 赞皇县| 九龙县| 吉木萨尔县| 沙洋县| 军事| 铜陵市| 宝坻区| 米脂县| 峨眉山市| 宜川县| 菏泽市| 宜章县| 常山县| 基隆市| 武胜县| 宾阳县| 静宁县| 永川市| 德惠市| 静宁县| 马边| 涟源市| 秦安县| 抚顺市| 双流县| 丰原市| 扎囊县| 娄烦县| 淮安市| 博兴县|