找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Judicial Activism; An Interdisciplinary Luís Pereira Coutinho,Massimo La Torre,Steven D. S Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Swit

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 29050|回復(fù): 52
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:57:04 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Judicial Activism
副標題An Interdisciplinary
編輯Luís Pereira Coutinho,Massimo La Torre,Steven D. S
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/502/501392/501392.mp4
概述Addresses judicial activism in both American and European Courts.Offers new conceptual tools and approaches.Features high profile authors from both sides of the Atlantic.Includes supplementary materia
叢書名稱Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice
圖書封面Titlebook: Judicial Activism; An Interdisciplinary Luís Pereira Coutinho,Massimo La Torre,Steven D. S Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Swit
描述.This volume offers different perspectives on judicial practice in the European and American contexts, both arguably characterized in the last decades by the emergence of novel normative and even policy arguments by judges. The central question deserving the attention of the contributors concerns the degree in which judicial exercises in practical reasoning may amount to forms of judicial usurpation of the legislative function by courts. Since different views as to the nature and scope of legal reasoning lead to different degrees of tolerance regarding what should be admissible to courts, that same nature and scope is thoroughly debated..The main disciplinary approach is that of general jurisprudence, but the contributions take stock of other disciplines in which judicial activism has been addressed, namely positive theories of judicial behavior. Accordingly, the book also explores the development of interdisciplinary dialogue about the theme..
出版日期Book 2015
關(guān)鍵詞American Supreme Court; Comparative Judicial Politics; Constitutional Justice; Contextual nature of pro
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18549-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-36514-5
isbn_ebook978-3-319-18549-1Series ISSN 1534-6781 Series E-ISSN 2214-9902
issn_series 1534-6781
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2015
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Judicial Activism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Judicial Activism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Activism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Judicial Activism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Activism被引頻次




書目名稱Judicial Activism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Activism年度引用




書目名稱Judicial Activism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Activism讀者反饋




書目名稱Judicial Activism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:43:08 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:25:49 | 只看該作者
Judicial Activism and “Reason”etimes more like the opposite of “reason,” consisting of poorly supported accusations of hatred or animus against the supporters of the measures that the courts choose to invalidate. This essay discusses how judicial discourse can degenerate into this sort of denigration. In world of advanced moral
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:11:40 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:53:36 | 只看該作者
Adjudication as Grammatication: The Case of French Judicial Politicsing the desire for the absence of any judicial law-making whatsoever, can hide the fact that every judgment is the expression both of a legal and of a political intervention, even as it purports to hide under what would appear to be a strictly grammatical exercise.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:34:36 | 只看該作者
The Activist Judge—Vanity of Vanities that might be offered in reply by a judge accused of this failing. The first relates to the purpose of a written constitution, and when the desire to want to lock things in cannot sensibly be a controlling concern when interpreting that written constitution. The second relates to the act utilitaria
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:49:12 | 只看該作者
Schmitt’s Spectre and Kelsen’s Promise: The Polemics on the Guardian of the Constitutionng it afterwards with each author’s conception of democracy and views of the proper nature of the judicial function. For both authors, the conception of democracy is the key to determine the guardian of the Constitution. Furthermore, just as these conceptions of democracy can be envisaged as the two
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:18:13 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:41:49 | 只看該作者
The Passive Sovereignty of the Constitutional Judge a State Theory Approachvant given the spread of a legislative model of dealing with emergencies. The definitional structure of the constitutional state is the framework within which that hypothesis is tested. If that structure is understood in Kelsenian terms, judicial passivity will be a breaching element of the same. In
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:21:26 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 16:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宁波市| 曲靖市| 南川市| 禄丰县| 临清市| 富锦市| 拜城县| 三台县| 大港区| 谷城县| 永和县| 临澧县| 香格里拉县| 遵义市| 南和县| 休宁县| 乐业县| 洪湖市| 甘德县| 白河县| 通道| 沧源| 南皮县| 曲阜市| 长垣县| 龙井市| 霍城县| 康马县| 阳东县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 印江| 孝感市| 开原市| 长顺县| 吴川市| 绥芬河市| 疏勒县| 凤冈县| 阳城县| 库伦旗| 革吉县|