找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Judges Against Justice; On Judges When the R Hans Petter Graver Book 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Judicial behaviour.Legal p

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 12951|回復(fù): 58
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:50:18 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Judges Against Justice
副標(biāo)題On Judges When the R
編輯Hans Petter Graver
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/502/501377/501377.mp4
概述Guidance on how to diminish judicial cooperation in oppression.Close-up tour of judges in their complicity with bad legal regimes.First comprehensive treatment of criminal liability for judges for uph
圖書封面Titlebook: Judges Against Justice; On Judges When the R Hans Petter Graver Book 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Judicial behaviour.Legal p
描述.This book explores concrete situations in which judges are faced with a legislature and an executive that consciously and systematically discard the ideals of the rule of law. It revolves around three basic questions: What happen when states become oppressive and the judiciary contributes to the oppression? How can we, from a legal point of view, evaluate the actions of judges who contribute to oppression? And, thirdly, how can we understand their participation from a moral point of view and support their inclination to resist?.
出版日期Book 2015
關(guān)鍵詞Judicial behaviour; Legal positivism; Nazi law; Rule of law
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44293-7
isbn_softcover978-3-662-52594-4
isbn_ebook978-3-662-44293-7
copyrightSpringer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Judges Against Justice影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Judges Against Justice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judges Against Justice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Judges Against Justice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judges Against Justice被引頻次




書目名稱Judges Against Justice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judges Against Justice年度引用




書目名稱Judges Against Justice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judges Against Justice讀者反饋




書目名稱Judges Against Justice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:24:45 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:07:50 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:04:41 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:54:25 | 只看該作者
The Opposition as lawyers, are brave protectors of the rights and freedoms of individuals. In the examples I have chosen for this book, however, the judiciary have failed and become accomplice to the oppression. Even though the judiciary in these cases has contributed to the atrocities of oppressive regimes, this
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:52:26 | 只看該作者
The Argument for Criminal Liabilityhown that also judges can be responsible under international law for atrocities committed as part of the application and enforcement of municipal law. This was first established by the US Military Tribunal against leaders of the Nazi legal system and has since been confirmed by the European Court of
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:26:59 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:46:04 | 只看該作者
The Condition of Illegality and Failed Usurpationshem accountable is more straightforward. The revolutionaries can be held accountable according to the law of the regime that they tried to overthrow, which made their acts illegal at the time. To the extent that the revolutionaries establish new institutions such as special courts and tribunals, the
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:45:04 | 只看該作者
The Condition of Illegality in Transitional Settings conscious and cleverly designed and executed strategy by the Nazi Party. The regime was perceived as legal according to the German constitution by contemporary society, both within Germany and abroad. Virtually, a whole generation of German legal scholars gave support to the legality of the new reg
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:20:28 | 只看該作者
Justification of Judicial Oppressionl rights. Despite this, it may not always be just to prosecute them and hold them criminally responsible for this. As we have seen, judges are under pressure from different values and ideals when it comes to their duty to uphold the law. The decision of whether to stay on the bench, giving support t
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 11:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宜兰县| 大邑县| 自贡市| 莎车县| 夏津县| 镇雄县| 永城市| 长乐市| 五家渠市| 丽水市| 景德镇市| 北碚区| 乌鲁木齐县| 聊城市| 新密市| 石狮市| 汪清县| 祥云县| 平罗县| 额敏县| 东城区| 休宁县| 昭苏县| 景宁| 雷州市| 阿尔山市| 德格县| 永宁县| 岢岚县| 咸丰县| 九龙县| 依兰县| 成都市| 晋城| 九龙坡区| 聂拉木县| 突泉县| 南木林县| 皮山县| 武川县| 沙河市|