Titlebook: John Ford and the Caroline Theatre; Dorothy M. Farr Book 1979 Dorothy M. Farr 1979 history.literature.North America.theatre.theatre histor

MELD

Poet-dramatist in the Caroline Theatre,s primarily in his response as an artist to that situation. In date, in manner and attitude, to some extent in the content of his surviving independent plays, he is clearly of the Caroline theatre, but his habit of presenting Caroline conceptions within a Jacobean pattern, his obvious attachment to

蔓藤圖飾

單調性

屈尊

Reassessment of the , Theme at the Phoenix in ,iendship was a late Jacobean vintage which had not lost its savour in the Caroline theatre, and the inevitably associated theme of sexual jealousy, with its potential psychological implications and scope for intrigue, had been developed in the contemporary theatre by Massinger, Brome and Shirley. Su

意外

Return to Blackfriars and the Classical Tragic Pattern in ,uperficially, Ford gives the Caroline audience what it expects. Here again is the theme of true love wrenched apart by the tyranny of ambition, again we have the conflict between passion and honour, again the tensions of jealousy; again too we have the never-failing joke of the elderly jealous husba

ACTIN

Revival of Chronicle History at the Phoenix in ,n’ (I: 1 : p. 384). The house of Lancaster has replaced the house of York, the tyrant Richard III is dead and the country is freed from bloodshed — but not for long. Time has already tried the new dynasty in the imposture of Lambert Simnel, now Henry’s falconer, fostered in his claim to the throne a

處理

Return to Domestic Tragi-comedy at the Phoenix: ,e integrity of the individual against the pressures of established moral and social codes, against the tensions of pride, ambition, lust and love, and against the inexorable march of human events. Now he was to turn to the predicament of the individual confronted with the claims and prejudices of a

colostrum

The Challenge of the Caroline Theatre,torical hindsight. Never since the drama became secular had the companies and the dramatists who wrote for them known such professional status or such reliable protection. Elizabeth had remained aloof from tensions between the theatres and the Puritan party, James had given his patronage and, in ord

eulogize

chassis