Titlebook: John Dryden; A Literary Life Paul Hammond Book 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1991 bibliography.drama.

Confer

書目名稱John Dryden影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱John Dryden影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱John Dryden網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱John Dryden網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱John Dryden被引頻次




書目名稱John Dryden被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱John Dryden年度引用




書目名稱John Dryden年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱John Dryden讀者反饋




書目名稱John Dryden讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Exposure

,The New Writer 1660–7,o have to depend upon such a source, Shadwell’s . (1682) provides some necessary clues:.Shadwell’s footnotes identify the bookseller as ‘.. Herringman, .’, and the knight as ‘. R.H. ..’ It is indeed possible that Dryden wrote several prefaces to books which Herringman published, though this can hard

窗簾等

躺下殘殺

剝皮

加入

,The Religious Writer 1665–87,nents, but in the case of Dryden it may also have reflected the interest in varieties of religious belief which he had shown as a dramatist. The changes in Dryden’s own religious views and ecclesiastical allegiance, particularly his conversion to Rome, also prompted charges that he was merely an irr

教唆

,The Translator 1680–1700,eing represented, translating individuals and causes into unexpected shapes. His literary criticism brings together writers across different times and cultures, considering one in terms of another, working out the relative characteristics of particular authors, languages and societies by a process o

割公牛膨脹

Epilogue,im in daily social life. Shadwell’s . (quoted in chapter 5) asserts that Dryden’s social embarrassment led him to produce crude obscenity which he mistook for wit. Whether true or not, such an appropriation of Dryden’s voice and representation of his intimate discourse with friends is an instance of

CLASP

孤僻