找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Joel on Software; And on Diverse and O Joel Spolsky Book 2004 Joel Spolsky 2004 .NET.Chef.Open Source.computer science.design.language.prog

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 26443|回復(fù): 69
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:09:16 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Joel on Software
副標(biāo)題And on Diverse and O
編輯Joel Spolsky
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/502/501012/501012.mp4
概述Covers three years of the best essays.Ranges from the technical to humorous essays.Authored by one of the most popular programmers
圖書封面Titlebook: Joel on Software; And on Diverse and O Joel Spolsky Book 2004 Joel Spolsky 2004 .NET.Chef.Open Source.computer science.design.language.prog
描述.Joel Spolsky. began his legendary web log, www.joelonsoftware.com, in March 2000, in order to offer insights for improving the world of programming. Spolsky based these observations on years of personal experience...The result just a handful of years later? Spolsky‘s technical knowledge, caustic wit, and extraordinary writing skills have earned him status as a programming guru! His blog has become renowned throughout the programming worldnow linked to more than 600 websites and translated into over 30 languages...Joel on Software .covers every conceivable aspect of software programming—from the best way to write code, to the best way to design an office in which to write code! All programmers, all people who want to enhance their knowledge of programmers, and all who are trying to manage programmers will surely relate to Joel‘s musings..
出版日期Book 2004
關(guān)鍵詞; NET; Chef; Open Source; computer science; design; language; programming; software
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-0753-5
isbn_softcover978-1-59059-389-9
isbn_ebook978-1-4302-0753-5
copyrightJoel Spolsky 2004
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Joel on Software影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Joel on Software影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Joel on Software網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Joel on Software網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Joel on Software被引頻次




書目名稱Joel on Software被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Joel on Software年度引用




書目名稱Joel on Software年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Joel on Software讀者反饋




書目名稱Joel on Software讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:48:12 | 只看該作者
The Joel Test: 12 Steps to Better Codehat stuff. So I’ve come up with my own, highly irresponsible, sloppy test to rate the quality of a software team. The great part about it is that it takes about three minutes. With all the time you save, you can go to medical school.
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:31:35 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:08:00 | 只看該作者
Five Worlds In the first room, everybody dealt with dough problems all day. Dough got stuck in the machines, on your hands, in your hair, on your shoes, and everybody carried a little paint scraper to clean up dough jams. In the second room, everybody dealt with crumb problems all day. Crumbs got stuck in the
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:47:51 | 只看該作者
Paper Prototyping of interns “whip up a prototype” suitable for usability testing, using the cutting-edge Visual Basic 1.0. Building the prototype took all summer, because it had to duplicate so much of Excel’s real functionality or you couldn’t do a real usability test.
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:15:39 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:57:59 | 只看該作者
Craftsmanshipoftware factories” that could churn out high-quality code on an assembly line. It didn’t make any sense then and it doesn’t make sense now. Shoving a lot of programmers into a room and lining them up in neat rows did not really help get the bug counts down.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:16:45 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:38:51 | 只看該作者
, we both agreed on certain fundamental points. (1) Both of us rejected the doctrine, enunciated by Gilbert Harman [Harman 1965], that . forms of nondemonstrative inference fall under the rubric of Inference to the Best Explanation. (2) We agreed that the Hypothetico-Deductive method is fatally flaw
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:36:05 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 00:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
集贤县| 安仁县| 武乡县| 兰州市| 新平| 柏乡县| 利津县| 长寿区| 醴陵市| 定结县| 隆林| 木兰县| 合江县| 那曲县| 石阡县| 自贡市| 内黄县| 瑞昌市| 东山县| 泰安市| 临泉县| 图们市| 曲沃县| 金塔县| 佛冈县| 栖霞市| 岐山县| 长岛县| 隆子县| 常山县| 阿合奇县| 阳城县| 永川市| 禄丰县| 武宁县| 凯里市| 台湾省| 吉隆县| 元谋县| 东乡族自治县| 峡江县|