Titlebook: Jean Monnet; The Path to European Douglas Brinkley (Assistant Professor of History a Book 1991 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature Ame

energy

書目名稱Jean Monnet影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Jean Monnet影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Jean Monnet網絡公開度




書目名稱Jean Monnet網絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Jean Monnet被引頻次




書目名稱Jean Monnet被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Jean Monnet年度引用




書目名稱Jean Monnet年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Jean Monnet讀者反饋




書目名稱Jean Monnet讀者反饋學科排名

承認

心痛

厚顏

Forward with Jean Monnet, detail and on a world scale. I was a little heedless, not always aware of my luck. Later I realized that my life would have no other meaning than to have been the witness of an historic achievement. I helped, to the utmost of my powers, its author to write the story of this achievement and to draw

glacial

Jean Monnet, the United States and the French Economic Plan,t’s ideas shaped the structure of the economy of postwar Europe, and consequently, determined much of its political evolution as well. Monnet’s influence was not a reflection of any specific position he held. He was first, head of the French Supply Council, the economic purchasing mission that coord

notion

Jean Monnet and the European Coal and Steel Community: A Preliminary Appraisal,ndustries of his nation with those of her neighbors in order to form what would later be called the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC).. In April 1951 negotiations for the proposed organization concluded. Its executive organ, the High Authority (HA), began operations in August of the following

薄荷醇

What Type of Europe?,rrents of thinking, one embodied by Jean Monnet, the other by General de Gaulle. The former and his followers thought that one day, in the not too distant future, national sovereignties would merge into a European sovereignty and that for headway to be made in that direction, national sovereignties

常到

,Jean Monnet’s Methods, all appearances, a rather anonymous, technocratic figure. True, he was the source of the European Community, the first man to propose European union in a form governments had to take seriously. But this cannot by itself be the reason. For one thing, he shares the credit of innovation with Robert Sc

競選運動

What Type of Europe?,rrents of thinking, one embodied by Jean Monnet, the other by General de Gaulle. The former and his followers thought that one day, in the not too distant future, national sovereignties would merge into a European sovereignty and that for headway to be made in that direction, national sovereignties had to be progressively dismantled.

Gratuitous