找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation; The Pragmatics of Qu Fabrizio Macagno,Douglas Walton Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2

[復制鏈接]
查看: 52628|回復: 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:19:07 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation
副標題The Pragmatics of Qu
編輯Fabrizio Macagno,Douglas Walton
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/473/472779/472779.mp4
概述Provides a unique analysis of the uses and the dangerous effects of quotations in political discourse and legal cases.Offers a method and a procedure for evaluating quotes and misquotes.Analyzes quota
叢書名稱Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology
圖書封面Titlebook: Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation; The Pragmatics of Qu Fabrizio Macagno,Douglas Walton Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2
描述.This book shows how research in linguistic pragmatics, philosophy of language,?and rhetoric can be connected through argumentation to analyze a recognizably?common strategy used in political and everyday conversation, namely the distortion?of another’s words in an argumentative exchange. Straw man argumentation refers to?the modification of a position by misquoting, misreporting or wrenching the original?speaker’s statements from their context in order to attack them more easily or more?effectively. Through 63 examples taken from different contexts (including political?and forensic discourses and dialogs) and 20 legal cases, the book analyzes the explicit?and implicit types of straw man, shows how to assess the correctness of a quote or a?report, and illustrates the arguments that can be used for supporting an interpretation?and defending against a distortion. The tools of argumentation theory, a discipline aimed at investigating the uses of arguments by combining insights from pragmatics, logic, and communication,?are applied?to provide an original account of interpretation and reporting, and to describe and illustrate tactics and procedures that can be used and implemented for p
出版日期Book 2017
關鍵詞Types of ad hominem; Uses of ambiguity; Interpretation and presumptive reasoning; The burden of misquot
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62545-4
isbn_softcover978-3-319-87337-4
isbn_ebook978-3-319-62545-4Series ISSN 2214-3807 Series E-ISSN 2214-3815
issn_series 2214-3807
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation被引頻次




書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation年度引用




書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation讀者反饋




書目名稱Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:13:15 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:32:49 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:29:49 | 只看該作者
978-3-319-87337-4Springer International Publishing AG 2017
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:28:54 | 只看該作者
Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation978-3-319-62545-4Series ISSN 2214-3807 Series E-ISSN 2214-3815
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:11:58 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:15:37 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:40:59 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:01:48 | 只看該作者
The Strategies of Misattribution of Commitments,ed version of the other’s viewpoint or commitments, in order to rebut his argument more easily by attacking a position that has been simplified and weakened. This strategy, however, can lead to the risk of being accused of breaching the rules of the discussion by distorting the other’s ideas. This r
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:35:21 | 只看該作者
Evaluating Relevance and Commitments in Rhetorical Straw Man, the notion of argumentative relevance for assessing when a viewpoint is correctly reported or manipulated. We will describe relevance as a sequential concept referring to the number of premises and intermediate arguments to connect a move (the interpretation of a move in this case) to the issue or
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 17:09
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
彭水| 霍州市| 林州市| 淮阳县| 三原县| 德清县| 文登市| 桑植县| 郎溪县| 密云县| 嘉义县| 思南县| 南通市| 永宁县| 于都县| 屏边| 鄱阳县| 九龙城区| 丰顺县| 瑞安市| 哈巴河县| 博兴县| 新河县| 驻马店市| 云南省| 抚顺县| 渭南市| 昆明市| 岐山县| 临海市| 临沧市| 铁岭市| 定结县| 南投县| 南昌市| 万州区| 依兰县| 宿州市| 江门市| 青田县| 西峡县|