Titlebook: Interpretation without Truth; A Realistic Enquiry Pierluigi Chiassoni Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Analytical Scepticism.A

JOLT

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Interpretation without Truth讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

調(diào)整

Interpretation, Truth, and the Logical Forms of Interpretive Discourse,e find in interpretive discourse? By providing an answer to these questions, the chapter purports to set the stage for the whole book. In carrying out an enquiry concerning the connections between legal interpretation and truth, it outlines a realistic conceptual apparatus, which aims at capturing (

虛弱的神經(jīng)

Interpretive Games, prize. The chapter purports to provide a first line of argument in favour of a construction conception, by arguing against a couple of theories of legal interpretation—the “word-meaning theory” and the “sentence-meaning theory”—worked out by influential legal theorists with an eye to the philosophy

Narrative

死亡率

Frames v. Containers,antage point. It considers and compares two competing theories concerning the notions of legal interpretation and of general norms of written-law. These are the frame of interpretations theory and the container-retrieval theory—the latter, as we shall see, in a conventional linguistic meaning variet

Fibrinogen

Towards Pragmatic Realism,. It presents a five-steps argument. The first step lays down a conceptual framework. The second step provides a revisited account of three theories of legal interpretation—realism (non-cognitivism) and two varieties of formalism (integral and limited cognitivism)—putting forth a few criticisms of t

Ligament

極為憤怒

Precedent,n of .; (b) the interpretation of precedents; (c) the practical relevance of precedents. Dealing with the first issue, three notions of . are proposed by way of a rational reconstruction of on-going concepts. Dealing with the second issue, the whole set of common law techniques for coping with prece

后天習(xí)得

Defeasibility and Legal Indeterminacy,her hot spot, legal indeterminacy. Considering linguistic therapy the lot of useful philosophical enquiry, it proceeds to the analysis of the “structure” of philosophical thought on the matter, proposing a rational reconstruction thereof. The ultimate goal is contributing to the laying down of a sou

火光在搖曳