Titlebook: International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics; Marieke Goede Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publisher

faultfinder

International Political Economy and Poststructural Politics978-0-230-80089-2Series ISSN 2662-2483 Series E-ISSN 2662-2491

Fibrinogen

Introduction: International Political Economy and the Promises of Poststructuralismof the modern economy within a fragmented political system’ (Palan 2000: 17), and poststructural politics, have been sporadic and antagonistic. It is possible to say that IPE has been particularly resistant to poststructural intervention. Simply put, if post-structuralism has come to be understood a

fluoroscopy

大笑

goodwill

Securing the Global (Bio)Political Economy: ,, Poststructuralism and Political Economy Relations (IR) has traditionally understood ‘the internationar to be a ‘“thin” space of strategic interaction,’ a space that is ‘spare compared to domestic spaces.’ Barkawi and Laffey go on to argue that ‘IR’s central categories of sovereignty and the states-system generate a systematic occlusion’

gout109

bleach

Libidinal International Political Economy 1987), Jean-Fran?ois Lyotard (1993) observes that capital is the only remaining totalizing force in modern society. He adds, ‘everyone knows’ that ‘state officials’ primary duty nowadays is to ensure the health and long term stability of capital. The idea that capital is the principal structuring f

habitat

Madrigal

International Political Economy: Beyond the Poststructuralist/Historical Materialist Dichotomye, an intellectually honest response to poststructuralism (compatible with enlightenment ideals) would require IPE to take seriously the question of discourse and discursive representation. Hence, any claim that this question amounts to no more than a distraction has to be rejected. However, dramati

解決