找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence; Donald H. Saklofske,Moshe Zeidner Book 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New Yo

[復制鏈接]
樓主: damped
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:47:22 | 只看該作者
Cognitive Interference personal preoccupations that interfere with attention to the task at hand. Personality can facilitate performance (e.g., through high motivation and the ability to become absorbed in tasks), but it can also debilitate it (e.g., through worrying about the consequences of failure and being uncooperative with the tester).
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:06:05 | 只看該作者
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:00:06 | 只看該作者
Theoretical and Empirical Relationships between Personality and Intelligencelity of interests for the different approaches to overlap. This is evident for areas of intellectual functioning like creativity or cognitive style (see Brody, 1972), but the prevailing tendency is to treat intelligence and personality as independent.
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:13:51 | 只看該作者
Personality Trait Correlates of Intelligencek, 1985). Although some of the most influential figures in the field of intelligence and personality allude repeatedly to the inextricable web or nexus of interrelations among these two constructs (see Chapter 13), researchers have traditionally treated them as relatively independent factors in their analyses.
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:53:45 | 只看該作者
978-1-4419-3239-6Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:07:20 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 21:55:43 | 只看該作者
Perspectives on Individual Differenceshttp://image.papertrans.cn/i/image/471628.jpg
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 05:19:19 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:05:00 | 只看該作者
The Interface between Intelligence and Personality as Determinants of Classroom LearningI find it helpful to consider the relationship between intelligence and personality as determinants of classroom learning in terms of three broad questions:
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:26:30 | 只看該作者
Ideological Aspects of Research on Personality and Intelligence, the presence of a chapter on ideology has to be justified, or at least explained. Would the presentation of the field not have been complete without it? Do we really need this kind of reflection from the sidelines of actual research? At the outset, I also need to define (and possibly justify) my terms of reference.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 00:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
盐城市| 高要市| 永昌县| 石嘴山市| 高雄市| 饶阳县| 焦作市| 寿阳县| 花莲县| 马山县| 侯马市| 桑日县| 大洼县| 太白县| 新营市| 科技| 盐亭县| 崇义县| 河间市| 荔波县| 岳西县| 娱乐| 平原县| 隆尧县| 蒲江县| 天柱县| 佛教| 盐山县| 尚志市| 安康市| 如皋市| 丘北县| 紫阳县| 和静县| 延寿县| 新巴尔虎右旗| 上栗县| 罗江县| 榕江县| 汉川市| 德兴市|