Titlebook: International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change; Carlo Carraro Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 Climate C

審美家

書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change被引頻次




書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change年度引用




書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change年度引用學科排名




書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change讀者反饋




書目名稱International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change讀者反饋學科排名

同義聯(lián)想法

conservative

foppish

Negotiating greenhouse abatement and the theory of public goods,me more prominent. A number of countries now support differentiated targets to take account of the special economic circumstances of different economies and an emission trading scheme has been proposed in policy negotiations.

粗俗人

Necessary conditions for stabilization agreements,at would have to be met for an international agreement to have hope of achieving such a goal. The resulting analysis can serve as a guide to discussion of the policies and institutions needed to carry out this complex task, and add reality to the setting of the goal itself.

Femish

Burden sharing, joint implementation, and carbon coalitions,s to accept the idea of joint implementation within the set of nations party to an agreement to abate, which we take here to be the OECD. It remains an open and controversial issue if this will be extended to include abatement undertaken by countries that are not party to the agreement.

forthy

Exploring a technology strategy for stabilizing atmospheric CO2,jectories consistent with various atmospheric concentration ceilings. Since an emissions path is not uniquely prescribed by a concentration ceiling, various criteria have been added to shape trajectories, including implied climate impacts and costs.

Contracture

The optimal timing of greenhouse gas emission abatement, individual rationality and intergenerationconfirm this (Edmonds et al., 1997; Manne and Richels, 1997a,b; Peck and Teisberg, 1996; Weyant, 1997). Apparently, the conclusion is that it is better to postpone substantial emission reduction for at least a decade.

自愛

Obscure

Co2 concentration limits, the costs and benefits of control, and the potential for international ag some emission paths will have much higher economic costs of achieving a given target, while producing only slightly lower global mean temperature and sea level rises during the period of transition to the ultimate concentration target.