Titlebook: Integrating Science and Politics for Public Health; Patrick Fafard,Adèle Cassola,Evelyne de Leeuw Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2022 The Editor(s) (if appl

滔滔不絕地講

Political Science In, Of, and With Public Healthich “politics” interferes with the making of public health policy whereas political science sees politics as endemic and something to be better understood. To transcend this stalemate this exploratory essay proposes a typology of the possible interactions between political science and public health:

Myosin

專(zhuān)心

SPECT

灰姑娘

orthodox

金絲雀

Is Local Better? Evolving Hybrid Theorising for Local Health Policies yields novel and actionable insights. But this chapter purports to show that there may be a qualitative difference for the effectiveness of this deployment across jurisdictions. It shows how the application of a comprehensive and hybrid array of political science theories to public health issues at

cringe

Select Committee Governance and the Production of Evidence: The Case of UK E-cigarettes Policystries to influence the evidentiary content of policy debates. It introduces these issues through the example of the regulatory debate on electronic cigarettes and the 2018 Science and Technology enquiry into their regulations. Through this we identify a more general set of issues around the governa

沒(méi)有準(zhǔn)備

The Policy and Politics of Public Health in Pandemics However, prior to coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), public health analyses undertaken within a political science paradigm focused primarily on how to mobilize decision-makers in order to bring about particular kinds of legislation or policy initiatives (policies on tobacco, alcohol, urban design, etc.).

煩憂(yōu)