Titlebook: Instrument Development in the Affective Domain; Robert K. Gable Book 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986 Motivation.Persona

Creditee

Robert K. Gablereas the World Bank (1998) was rather sceptical regarding aid effectiveness, the Commission for Africa (2005) proposes doubling aid to Africa, arguing that aid is effective and can be made even more so. One of the reservations expressed in World Bank (1998) was fungibility — aid intended for investm

想象

ion literature, we can turn to the core of our study: the empirical analysis. We want to understand how donors distribute their adaptation-relevant development assistance: who receives support for climate change adaptation, and why? We address this question using both quantitative and qualitative re

盟軍

follicle

chlorosis

The Validity of Affective Instruments,e?” Contrary to the thinking of some researchers, a test is not certified once and for all as“valid.” Rather, the investigation of validity is an ongoingprocess. The process continually addresses the appropriateness of the inferences to be made from scores obtained from the instrument (see Cronbach,

COMA

The Reliability of Affective Instruments,eliability, which is concerned with the question “Does the instrument provide us with an accurate assessment of the affective characteristics?” By “accurate assessment” we mean scores that are . upon one administration of the instrument as well as . over time given two administrations (see Stanley,

彎腰

A Review of the Steps for Developing an Affective Instrument,nalized by developing belief statements or, in the case of the semantic differential, bipolar adjective pairs. Chapter 3 described the standard techniques for scaling affective characteristics. Techniques described included Thurstone’s equal-appearing interval, latent trait, Likert’s summated rating

orient

財(cái)產(chǎn)

COKE