Titlebook: Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century; Supporting Education Valerie J. Shute,Betsy Jane Becker Book 2010 Springer-Verlag US 2010 Asses

estradiol

書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century被引頻次




書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century年度引用




書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century讀者反饋




書目名稱Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Introvert

Human Action and Social Groups as the Natural Home of Assessment: Thoughts on 21st Century Learninghuman learning. This is its “natural home”. Social groups have always lifted assessment out of the circuit of human action and partially formalized it as a way of both “mentoring” and “policing” (norming) newcomers and members alike. This aspect of assessment is more prevalent today than ever thanks

稀釋前

滴注

genuine

Sharpening the Aim: Making Strides to Create an Assessment Culture in Schools,learning is an assertion strongly supported through my experiences in the field. There must be a significant shift in thinking and practices of teachers, as well as school leaders, to strengthen this link. The suggestion that National Assessment Tasks from NAEP be used to develop a focal point using

Gudgeon

VALID

Thinking About Assessments in a Transitional Time,e state such as Florida that uses standards-based assessments to make high-stakes decisions, the ECD approach holds promise, but also poses challenges. In this response to Russell Almond’s support of ECD, the authors focus on three key questions as they relate to this approach. The first question re

Harness

Participatory Assessment of 21st Century Proficiencies,ing educational systems. Traditional content standards, achievement tests, and accountability pressures threaten nascent efforts to foster equitable, transparent, and credible participation in these practices. The current push to design external tests and standards to assess these new practices may

伸展

TAIN