Titlebook: Innovations in the History of Analytical Philosophy; Sandra Lapointe,Christopher Pincock Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The A

PACK

Magisterial

責(zé)任

Euphonious

Introduction, inspired by recent work of Normore and Panaccio, provides a better account of the methodological pluralism exhibited in much of the best scholarship on the history of philosophy. The authors go on to consider the different tasks that fall under this pluralistic approach. This chapter concludes with

expunge

The Rise of ‘Analytic Philosophy’: When and How Did People Begin Calling Themselves ‘Analytic Philosler, more manageable set of interrelated questions: First, when and how did people begin using the label ‘a(chǎn)nalytic philosophy’? Second, how did those who used this label understand it? Third, why did many philosophers we today classify as analytic initially resist being grouped together under the si

詳細(xì)目錄

媒介

The History and Prehistory of Natural-Language Semanticswhich I mean the period when the formal methods of semantics developed for the purposes of studying formal languages. Due to their primarily mathematical and philosophical aims, the key prehistoric figures—I focus on Frege, Carnap, and Tarski—idealized away from aspects of sentence meaning other tha

發(fā)現(xiàn)

Russell on Acquaintance with Spatial Properties: The Significance of Jamestual purpose in “constructing” physical bodies out of sense-data is instead to show that psychology and physics are consistent. But how seriously engaged was Russell with actual psychology? I show that OKEW makes some non-trivial assumptions about the character of visual space, and I argue that he d

Anticonvulsants

使出神