Titlebook: Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics; For the Good of the Grzegorz Mazur, O.P. Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Medi

信賴

書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics被引頻次




書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics年度引用




書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics讀者反饋




書目名稱Informed Consent, Proxy Consent, and Catholic Bioethics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

osteopath

The Historical Development of the Principle of Free and Informed Consent,e law, with some subsequent statutory modifications” whereas the former “has been shaped by professional codes, statutes, and administrative regulations with the courts playing a less important role” (Berg et al. 2001, 249; see also Beauchamp and Faden 2004, 1274).

MAIZE

Critical

Critique of Proxy Consent Standards,ocus on its anthropological and ethical consequences. Third, I will show that autonomy, construed as pure self-determination, underlies not only SJS and PAS, as typically proposed, but also BIS, as a result of autonomy’s decisive impact on the way the notion of good, undergirding the patient’s or research subject’s best interests, is perceived.

表被動(dòng)

Dictation

Substitution

Externalize

Osteoarthritis

Lacerate