找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Indian Journalism and the Impact of Social Media; Dhiman Chattopadhyay Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under ex

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 專家
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:10:13 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 16:27:55 | 只看該作者
Gates and Influences: Theoretical Framework,se of social media and their perceptions of such platforms as professional tools..Finally, I evaluate studies that focus on journalism in India, specifically, how journalists select and share news. In doing so, I discuss knowledge gaps, such as lack of studies examining journalists’ perceptions abou
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 21:37:47 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 23:16:38 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 06:16:16 | 只看該作者
,Social Media’s Impact on Indian Journalism: Editors Speak,ews stories. Similarly, their reservations about social media platforms were grouped under three sub-categories, namely: (a) affects journalistic values and norms, (b) not a credible news source, and (c) accuracy is sacrificed at the altar of speed. Editors also spoke about a third, separate theme,
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 08:33:59 | 只看該作者
Implications,tribution of the findings to theory building. Other issues discussed in this chapter include implications of platform type or usefulness of a platform influencing story selection decisions. I also discuss one of the key findings that Indian journalists are not keen to be referred to as gatekeepers a
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 11:10:54 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 18:00:09 | 只看該作者
2662-480X ights into how new forces are influencing journalistic gatek.This book is a pan-India study that examines social media’s impact on Indian journalism, highlights emerging challenges, and discusses the way forward for India’s newsrooms. A result of three years of field work, the project uses mixed-met
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:14:53 | 只看該作者
Book 2022d for India’s newsrooms. A result of three years of field work, the project uses mixed-methods research – a survey of nearly 300 journalists from 15 Indian cities, followed by in-depth interviews with 25 senior editors – to analyze and explain journalists’ perceptions about social media’s usefulness
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:20:38 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 21:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
太保市| 辽阳市| 永安市| 金山区| 吴桥县| 隆德县| 迁西县| 镇远县| 宜兰县| 蒙城县| 翼城县| 山东省| 岚皋县| 克什克腾旗| 车险| 渑池县| 小金县| 屏东市| 历史| 禹州市| 霍山县| 五寨县| 顺义区| 会泽县| 西平县| 桦甸市| 松阳县| 凌源市| 吉隆县| 遵义县| 平安县| 定结县| 涟源市| 庄河市| 宜都市| 错那县| 大名县| 涡阳县| 靖安县| 崇礼县| 盐边县|