Titlebook: Imperfect competition in international trade; Winston W. Chang,Seiichi Katayama Book 1995 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995 Export.Import.co

深淵

多嘴多舌

Elimination of Firm and Welfare under International Oligopolyeral results on policy implications in this literature: the results are sensitive to the structure of models. For example, Eaton and Grossman (1986) have shown that the rate of optimal export subsidy can be either positive or negative depending on the nature of oligopolistic interdependence.

險代理人

Book 1995perfect competition within internationaltrade has been difficult until recent breakthroughs in this area,which have provided a more realistic view of the world economy. Thebook builds on the advances provided by such tools as game theory andthe theory of monopolistic competition. The first section c

Axillary

Theory and Policy of Trade with Imperfect Competition succeed in explaining the determinants of interindustry trade. However, they are not capable of explaining the phenomenon of intra-industry trade, which is a major component of world trade. This is chiefly due to the two traditional key assumptions of perfect competition and constant returns to scale.

蒙太奇

Endogenous Dualistic Structure, Marshallian Externalities, and Industrializationn important respects and usually characterizes developing economies as “dual” economies with substantial wage differentials between agriculture and industry. This view also endorses the policy recommendation that industry be subsidized or protected in order to promote economic development.

圓錐

BUOY

The Gains from Free Trade under Imperfect Competitiona possibly costly social experiment (see, for example, Helpman and Krugman (1985), pp. 96–100). What we need are propositions that relate trade gains to the underlying characteristics of the world economy (national endowments, preferences, technologies, and market structures).

悶熱

On the Behavior of Monopoly in General Equilibrium Trade Models, 1982), and others.) Concerning the behavior of monopoly, however, these existing studies simply adopted the partial equilibrium analysis and overlooked or otherwise neglected two important effects that may be crucial to the equilibrium outcome with a monopoly.

atopic

overweight